you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 25 points 10 months ago (11 children)

Patenting things you don't have intention of actually doing, "just in case", is just shit tbh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Used to be called patent trolling, but now that all the big corporations that own the politicians deciding patent law are doing it, it's considered "prudent business practice"

    IBM alone files more patents that they'll never use (except for lawsuits in case someone else does something useful with something similar) in a year than most companies file IN TOTAL for several decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    That is such fucking bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    It can prevent others from doing it, which can be a net good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    How? In this specific case it's about brand identity, so I don't think anyone else would make BMW-shaped screws. But in general, how is "I had this idea, I don't want to make it, but want to stop others from making it" good?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    how is "I had this idea, I don't want to make it, but want to stop others from making it" good?

    It isn't under ANY circumstances and to think so without being the patent trolling asshole yourself is some Stockholm syndrome level simping for the overlords.

  • source
  • parent