320
"Triple-A is in crisis" and games "don't have staying power because they're bad," says ex Gears of War director and Painkiller creator (www.pcgamesn.com)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
146 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 84 points 10 months ago* (15 children)

So copy what Kingdom Come: Deliverance and Baldur's Gate did and make good replayable games.

Also stop listening to the C suite and start listening to the gamers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (14 children)

    I'm curious though, viewing movies as investments has made a some studios filthy rich. Why does that seem to be different for games?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 32 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    Why do they need to get filthy rich? Why not settle for rich and having a good game?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    They absolutely don't. I'm just wondering why it works out financially for Marvel and Mission Impossible movies but not for games

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Movies have a bigger audience, require less time commitment, are heavily marketed, and cost less to see. Easier to convince people to see a so-so movie as long as it has a couple of good scenes. Harder to do with games, and gamers are usually at least somewhat more aware of games before they buy them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Suppose this is why Marvel films just don't work for me. Like, I can appreciate the artistic talent that went into things, I can appreciate that they've got impressive budgets and teams working on it, but narratively they kind of suck.

    Sat down and watched Antman with a friend recently. I liked the moments the main character had with his kid. I liked it when the step-dad showed equal care for the kid as the father, and them sort of resolving some of their differences in that moment. That was nice.

    I'm still bothered by the whole "when you shrink you retain your mass, so you're essentially like a bullet" part, and how that concept got completely shit-canned for the rest of the film. You can't just punt an ant-sized object weighing 90 kg, yet I think there was a moment where he literally got flicked away. Why even bother with some scientific-sounding BS if you're not going to adhere to it?

    Guess you're just not supposed to think about it. But then, what is the point? I don't read books to not think, I read books to experience something new, and have something to think about. Film works the same way for me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago

    On a movie set, the director has a huge amount of authority. It's been baked into the culture for about a hundred years that the director is one step below God. A studio treats films as investments, but they also hire a director and (mostly) get out of the way. Sure, producers do meddle, but it's nowhere close to the same amount as with games -- and all the meddling is still pointed at the director, not the crew. I think this limits the damage that can be done.

    Also, the film industry has strong unions. Most of the abuses in game dev simply aren't allowed. I suspect that the horrible culture of game dev can cause developers to stop caring, which bleeds through to the final product, and that won't happen to the same extent for movies.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    "Popcorn movies" are a big thing, and most of those big investments are these. They're "turn off you brain for two hours and chill" events. A game, even the most chill ones, almost always last much longer and require more engagement. That is the defining trait of the medium. If you can totally turn your brain off then you didn't make a game, you made an expensive movie. Games, for players, are an investment. Movies often aren't.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Even then, turn your brain off and chill only fits a certain market segment. Sure, it's a large market segment, just look at how popular the Marvel films are, but it's not the entire market, and just like with gaming when something truly compelling comes along it tends to shake things up a bit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent