When you’re interrupting your husband and Chuck Berry singing together by screeching into an adjacent mic impromptu when your only job was to play tambourine, your “art” is objectively bad.

And her reprehensible treatment of Lennon’z son is well documented, you can Google it.

All art is subjective, imo. Just because you didn't like what she was doing musically doesn't mean it's automatically bad

If art is subjective, then that's exactly what it means. Their subjective experience is that they didn't like it, so to them it's bad. And you're in no position to argue with someone's opinion on a subjective topic.

Edit: they're/ their

That said, I can't comment on her character,

Yoko described herself as a bad mother who twice abandoned her child in search of fame.

https://www.imaginepeace.com/archives/10408#%3A%7E%3Atext=For+years%2C+Yoko+didn%27t%2C%27+And+he+was+right.%E2%80%9D

Taking a shit in a zip lock bag, or duct taping a banana to a wall is not art.

It's fucking lazy, pretentious, bullshit.

A literal circle jerk.

Not everything has to be Monet or Robert Frost, but there HAS to be a vehicle of creation, a filter passing through the artist.

Screaming obnoxious sounds and saying it is singing, or placing a random object on a surface is not art or commentery, ESPECIALLY when the discussion is focused on "what is art".

Art can be proactive, controversial, or just a simple expression. But it has to have a purpose outside of "is it art?".

Otherwise everyone claiming AI slop is not art, is a hypocrite.

If you don’t know much about this person why are you arguing?