you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 10 months ago (5 children)

The ASPCA typically has a lower euthanasia rate than PETA because it often employs more selective admission policies, focusing on adopting out animals rather than accepting all animals regardless of their condition. In contrast, PETA operates as an open-admission shelter, which means it takes in all animals, leading to higher euthanasia rates due to the number of unadoptable or severely ill animals it receives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Doesn't the aspca also spend more on advertising than helping animals? I remember them also having a suspicously high CEO pay.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    "Focusing on adopting out animals" which results in >90% fatality? I would laugh but that's just not funny. The reason PETAs kill count is so high is because they fundamentally don't believe in livestock or owning pets, they see killing dogs, cats, and horses as a mercy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment