you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 71 points 10 months ago (8 children)

They aren't promoting an environmentalist message here though, but an anti-animal-cruelty message. You can agree or disagree that it's a good message, but it has nothing to do with their shitty AI ad.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Animals aren't as good as humans at surviving climate change, so caring about one should include caring about the other...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    It's a single AI image. The impact of generating a single image is basically nothing. I think it's a stupid post, but they should be able to post it without being denigrated about the effects of AI generated images

    This is a universal thing that happens to anyone advocating for positive change even if just tangentially to the environment. Constantly told it isn't perfect enough. Greta Thunberg had her efforts constantly belittled, no matter how she did it. She spent months crossing the ocean on a boat to avoid taking a plane, but was still put on blast for it

    Advocating for a more sustainable way of life shouldn't be met with a persistent, "but you're not perfect"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago

    they should be able to post it without being denigrated about the effects of AI generated images

    That's generous of you to give this specific organization a pass on this but that's your personal choice.

    Your ability to justify it is part of why everyone else thinks peta is a joke. It's so dogmatic it's become a religion.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 10 months ago*

    Firstly, human beings are animals.

    Secondly, there are plenty of examples of different species of animals that benefit - nay, thrive - because of climate change. Blanket statements such as yours is not helping either side.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago*

    I agree. However if you do stuff primarily for the animals, you almost always are secondarily doing things for ecology and society too, even if that isn't necessarily the intention. There are a lot of beneficial external side effects to spreading veganism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    The animal they're asking us not to eat requires water to live. Something ai uses a lot of.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    a big fish requires smaller fish to live. something that himans eat a lot of

    ai does use a lot of water, but i dont think its a driving factor that majorly affects fish. there may be places where industrial water use is "drying up" rivers, lakes, etc, but ai data centers are not likely a proportionally large part of this. most water use goes towards agriculture, and a lot of that agriculture is used for animal feed (for the animals that people eat) and creating ethanol to power cars. ai is bad, but not in a way tgat greatly affecta fish

  • source
  • parent