you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

"hierarchy of kings is the consequences of anarchy, a political system devoted to the abolition of hierarchy"

Do you really not understand how stupid you sound?

"Rule of Law replaced Rule of Kings"

Do you not know the phrase "the king's word is law"? You have literally zero clue what you're talking about and just spouting bullshit. Literally, zero clue if you believe that the decrees of kings weren't laws. The only difference is who held authority to dictate laws, going from kings to a body of elected representatives.

You just don't get it and I don't have the time to explain anarchism to you and the evolution of hierarchical governments. You're just heavily misinformed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Who are you quoting?
    Are you replying to the right comment?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    I just can't with stupid people. Piss off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    I'm asking because you quoted a statement with the phrase hierarchy of kings. But I never used that phrase, so I'm not sure who you're quoting.

    I would say calling anarchy a Political System, is something like calling a blank canvas a painting.
    Anarchy is the absence of a system. Once a system is in place, there's no longer anarchy.

  • source
  • parent