▲ 75 ▼ HDMI 2.2 interface finalised with 4K at 480 Hz and 12K at 120 Hz support, but you're going to need a new cable (www.pcgamer.com) submitted 1 year ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca 23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] skisnow@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] noride@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 year ago (2 children) I think It's more like the bandwidth needed to support 12k at 120hz also allows for 4k at 480hz, soo... por que no los dos? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] skisnow@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kogasa@programming.dev 14 points 1 year ago (1 child) It doesn't top out below 144Hz. There are benefits with diminishing returns up to at least 1000Hz especially for sample-and-hold displays (like all modern LCD/OLED monitors). 240Hz looks noticeably smoother than 144Hz, and 360Hz looks noticeably smoother than 240Hz. Past that it's probably pretty hard to tell unless you know what to look for, but there are a few specific effects that continue to be reduced. https://blurbusters.com/blur-busters-law-amazing-journey-to-future-1000hz-displays-with-blurfree-sample-and-hold/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago Yea, I think the limits are going to top out around that 300Hz mark, it's going to be really hard to convince people they can see or feel a difference between 300Hz and 480Hz. I have no preference between 240Hz and 300Hz already. For computer monitors, I also wouldn't be surprised if we top out at 4k for regular consumers, with a few niche 8k products available. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] noride@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 year ago (2 children) I think It's more like the bandwidth needed to support 12k at 120hz also allows for 4k at 480hz, soo... por que no los dos? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] skisnow@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kogasa@programming.dev 14 points 1 year ago (1 child) It doesn't top out below 144Hz. There are benefits with diminishing returns up to at least 1000Hz especially for sample-and-hold displays (like all modern LCD/OLED monitors). 240Hz looks noticeably smoother than 144Hz, and 360Hz looks noticeably smoother than 240Hz. Past that it's probably pretty hard to tell unless you know what to look for, but there are a few specific effects that continue to be reduced. https://blurbusters.com/blur-busters-law-amazing-journey-to-future-1000hz-displays-with-blurfree-sample-and-hold/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago Yea, I think the limits are going to top out around that 300Hz mark, it's going to be really hard to convince people they can see or feel a difference between 300Hz and 480Hz. I have no preference between 240Hz and 300Hz already. For computer monitors, I also wouldn't be surprised if we top out at 4k for regular consumers, with a few niche 8k products available. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] skisnow@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kogasa@programming.dev 14 points 1 year ago (1 child) It doesn't top out below 144Hz. There are benefits with diminishing returns up to at least 1000Hz especially for sample-and-hold displays (like all modern LCD/OLED monitors). 240Hz looks noticeably smoother than 144Hz, and 360Hz looks noticeably smoother than 240Hz. Past that it's probably pretty hard to tell unless you know what to look for, but there are a few specific effects that continue to be reduced. https://blurbusters.com/blur-busters-law-amazing-journey-to-future-1000hz-displays-with-blurfree-sample-and-hold/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago Yea, I think the limits are going to top out around that 300Hz mark, it's going to be really hard to convince people they can see or feel a difference between 300Hz and 480Hz. I have no preference between 240Hz and 300Hz already. For computer monitors, I also wouldn't be surprised if we top out at 4k for regular consumers, with a few niche 8k products available. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kogasa@programming.dev 14 points 1 year ago (1 child) It doesn't top out below 144Hz. There are benefits with diminishing returns up to at least 1000Hz especially for sample-and-hold displays (like all modern LCD/OLED monitors). 240Hz looks noticeably smoother than 144Hz, and 360Hz looks noticeably smoother than 240Hz. Past that it's probably pretty hard to tell unless you know what to look for, but there are a few specific effects that continue to be reduced. https://blurbusters.com/blur-busters-law-amazing-journey-to-future-1000hz-displays-with-blurfree-sample-and-hold/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago Yea, I think the limits are going to top out around that 300Hz mark, it's going to be really hard to convince people they can see or feel a difference between 300Hz and 480Hz. I have no preference between 240Hz and 300Hz already. For computer monitors, I also wouldn't be surprised if we top out at 4k for regular consumers, with a few niche 8k products available. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago Yea, I think the limits are going to top out around that 300Hz mark, it's going to be really hard to convince people they can see or feel a difference between 300Hz and 480Hz. I have no preference between 240Hz and 300Hz already. For computer monitors, I also wouldn't be surprised if we top out at 4k for regular consumers, with a few niche 8k products available. permalink fedilink source parent