you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 87 points 11 months ago (14 children)

If Netflix has this much money then I feel less bad about pirating their content for years now.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 11 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    It typically costs more money to finance something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago*

    Only for normal people. If you are rich or a company like this you can leverage assets for a rate lower than the rate of return on your investments and come out ahead by financing over paying cash. Rich people don't pay cash for anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Shareholders foot the bill, ultimately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Not the subscribers but the shareholders?

    I'll never understand economics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Well, in fact it's not that complicated - shareholders literally own the company - and this ownership results in both the right to decide what happens to the company and receiving dividends, which are supposed to come from the company's surplus funds. In reality it's not that straightforward, but that's the general idea. So if a company spends money, you can think of it as spending shareholders' money allocated in the company's assets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Well, in fact it's not that complicated

    In reality it's not that straightforward

    Well now I’m really fucking confused.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Sorry, I meant the whole idea is simple, but in reality capitalists exploit every single loophole to gain even more money, so there are laws against a lot of stuff - it would be that simple if people were trustworthy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Originally shareholders received a part share in the total profitability of the company. A dividend was the main source of income from investing.

    It didn't take them long to figure out that buying and selling shares of a company to other investors was usually more profitable than dividends. Its a hell of a lot easier to lie about potential value of the company than it's current reality.

    So for the past 100+ years the market value of the shares are often separated from the reality of the company. The value of the shares only exists because people or automated programs are willing to pay the amount. This is how companies who are operating under a huge deficits have increasing stock prices.

    Since the value of the shares can be so easily manipulated, market manipulation is the normal way investors make money today. It also means that major stockholders don't give a fuck about long term value of the company, the employees, or the damage to society & the environment they cause. They only care about making quickest profits, then passing the dumpster fire they created onto somebody else.

  • source
  • parent