So secure was the annual contest to fill three director and four officer positions that when one trustee lost his cryptographic key to unlock the results, the error made it impossible.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 104 points 11 months ago (11 children)

Assuming they were using threshold cryptography, they could have easily configured some redundancy into the system, e.g. by requiring 3 out of 5 people to decrypt it instead of 3 of 3.

It's easy to blame the one guy for losing the key, but he could have gotten hit by a bus or lost the hard drive in a house fire and they would have been equally as screwed. This is more of a system design failure than a PEBKAC failure.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    in complex systems design, you never blame human error. humans are fallible, and if the system doesn’t account for human error then it’s just a matter of time until failure occurs. look for a way to make the system tolerate or eliminate human error

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Normal error theory even takes the view that errors are inevitable in complex systems and that you need to design them so that the effects of those errors can't escalate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    literally the same concept as a comment i just wrote about russian hypersonic missiles breaking apart mid flight because they didn’t put limits on how fast they can change course when going mach 5 aha

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    look for a way to make the system tolerate human error

    Ah, if only managers understood this principle.

    My motto is that "all failures are management failures." But I'm not far enough up the chain to really implement that 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    According to the article they changed the procedure to require 2/3 keys, so at least they learned that lesson.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Which is stupid, since the reason they had 3/3 was that two people could not collaborate to change the results, which they now can with 2/3.

    Should have been changed to 3/5 instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment