292
no increase in radiation following US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear (i.redd.it)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/usa@midwest.social
68 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/update-on-developments-in-iran-4

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

The IAEA agrees with me. They are very concerned that Iran has almost certainly moved their 60% stock to an undisclosed location.

60% is still a long ways off from making a bomb, but there is also no reason to get it that far except to go further.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They don't agree with you.
    They didn't want it blown up by the US terrorists.
    US broke the deal, IAEA is also not impartial and despite all that Iran cooperated while they didn't need to.
    Cry all you want, I hope Iran starts on the bomb or Pakistan gives them one.
    They deserve it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I didn't say they blamed Iran, but concerned is concerned and it's pretty damn easy to Google. I'm not crying, I'm not supporting US actions, I'm not saying Iran is the devil. None of this has been part of this conversation until now, it's just the argument you want to have, and I'm not interested.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •