375
Microsoft has blocked Massgrave's KMS38 activation method for Windows (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
129 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://massgrave.dev/changelog#38

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (11 children)

When was the last time you used Linux? And what distro was it? Your complaints are a decade out of date.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    this exact situation happened about 3 months ago to my partner on a modern distro

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Just curious here.... nvidia + kernel update and not using dkms?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    yes, Nvidia, and who knows for the rest. i think it was Debian-based, maybe Mint. they went back to Win11 after barely a month because it was so rough, despite years of experience with Linux.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    This is what I meant by my comment here.

    Thats a hardware related annoyance that I've even seen on commercially distributed versions of Linux, and if it were set up correctly, you wouldn't have even noticed (aside from a bunch of scrolling text during the next boot when the new kernel was loaded). I had a client where they couldn't even get to the console of the server for this reason. Once set up correctly though, those updates have chugged away in the background... but I digress.

    I'm assuming you (and your partner) have no trouble at all navigating around and using linux, it was the (poorly managed) update process that gave you headaches. I think that is a perfectly reasonable complaint.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    of course the most popular graphics card manufacturer wouldn’t work out of the box on Linux! i would expect nothing less!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Its mostly because of what nvidia does - the newer stuff has open source drivers, but this is a more recent thing (past year or so), but a good chunk of their libraries are still closed, their firmware is still closed, and anything not supported by the newer open source kernel modules has to use the proprietary drivers.

    This is, unfortunately, outside of the control of the Linux kernel. And nvidia can be made to work just fine (I have a bunch of quadro cards for example) without dropping to the console, but that first setup to make it that way takes some knowledge. That, to me, is the big problem.

    Thats also why you'll see a lot of intel gpu's and amd gpu's in the linux world, while nvidia made that switch I mentioned to open on the new stuff, that was in 2024. AMD started their effort in 2015, its much more mature, and intel had open drivers for a bit over 10 years before that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I am well aware. avoiding all that bullshit is exactly why I continue to use Windows and would never advocate Linux blindly for desktop use.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    While I understand, that is what continues the problem btw. Supporting the company doing what is needed to make a switch to Linux easier is what will take away the problem, for better or worse.

    I'll also note I have regular issues Windows machines and GPUs, honestly its more of a pain in the ass to me. Specifically multi-monitor configs appearing as a single desktop - incredibly easy on Linux, while on windows I have to use Mosaic, and windows updates constantly break those configs. Among quite a few other things, but thats different territory.

    I have no qualms about recommending/advocating for Linux, because I know quite well what I can and can't do with it, as well as how to explain how to set it up to work easily. I have a lot of reservations about Windows use, because it can be such an absolute nightmare in some situations, and unlike Linux, there is no ability for me to fully take control and set things up right the first time.

    "Avoiding all that bullshit" is extremely dependent on what bullshit you're avoiding.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    You should give the name of the distro rather than just say modern. Ubuntu is "modern" and they broke the auto-updates for everyone some months ago. It's more about stability than modernity

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    oh, so when the Linux fanboys come out and say “you should switch to Linux, it’s easy!” they actually mean learn the decades long history of countless distributions, fork infighting, and an untold amount of software and hardware compatibility baggage, THEN switching will be easy! silly of me to make such a mistake!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    No? I just said it would be nicer if you precised the name of the distro when you have an issue. This way I'm less likely to recommand an unstable distro. That's it.

    You obviously can't be expected to know what distro is stable or not, I don't either

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent