▲ 598 ▼ Jack Dorsey Releases Vine Reboot Where AI Content Is Banned (futurism.com) submitted 1 year ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 141 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago (11 children) What's Loops? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] compostgoblin@piefed.blahaj.zone 46 points 1 year ago (1 child) A Fediverse platform for short form video, made by the guy who makes Pixelfed permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] fonix232@fedia.io 14 points 1 year ago Not really just short form, it's more of a take on video feeds rather than just the limited length quickcontent Vine was famous about. Obviously the focus is still on short(ish) content format, but I see more and more people transition to longer videos to deliver content. On YT/Facebook most videos I see nowadays are 10min or above. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (7 children) Vine, but federated! https://joinloops.org/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 9 points 11 months ago (1 child) More tiktok than vine, really permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago You're not wrong, but an arbitrary maximum video length is the least of my problems with a Dorsey product permalink fedilink source parent [–] stephen01king@piefed.zip 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) But does it ban AI content? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (3 children) That would be based on the server's policies, same as Lemmy or Mastodon. I'd trust a federated environment a billion times more than anything Jack Dorsey is doing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mark@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Yeah, will never understand why these big billionaires keep taking these "we are for the people" stances, but are still trying to spin up these same ol for-profit, centralized products. If they really cared, they'd use that money to help nonprofits or decentralized services and stay out of the damn way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) It's because it's profitable, that's why they do it. As long as they don't Elon Musk, most people either don't know who these people are or don't care. And if they do go full EM, then most people still don't care and it's still profitable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago* Yeah, they want money and clout permalink fedilink source parent [–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 21 points 11 months ago TikTok but without users. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] compostgoblin@piefed.blahaj.zone 46 points 1 year ago (1 child) A Fediverse platform for short form video, made by the guy who makes Pixelfed permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] fonix232@fedia.io 14 points 1 year ago Not really just short form, it's more of a take on video feeds rather than just the limited length quickcontent Vine was famous about. Obviously the focus is still on short(ish) content format, but I see more and more people transition to longer videos to deliver content. On YT/Facebook most videos I see nowadays are 10min or above. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 14 points 1 year ago Not really just short form, it's more of a take on video feeds rather than just the limited length quickcontent Vine was famous about. Obviously the focus is still on short(ish) content format, but I see more and more people transition to longer videos to deliver content. On YT/Facebook most videos I see nowadays are 10min or above. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (7 children) Vine, but federated! https://joinloops.org/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 9 points 11 months ago (1 child) More tiktok than vine, really permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago You're not wrong, but an arbitrary maximum video length is the least of my problems with a Dorsey product permalink fedilink source parent [–] stephen01king@piefed.zip 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) But does it ban AI content? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (3 children) That would be based on the server's policies, same as Lemmy or Mastodon. I'd trust a federated environment a billion times more than anything Jack Dorsey is doing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mark@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Yeah, will never understand why these big billionaires keep taking these "we are for the people" stances, but are still trying to spin up these same ol for-profit, centralized products. If they really cared, they'd use that money to help nonprofits or decentralized services and stay out of the damn way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) It's because it's profitable, that's why they do it. As long as they don't Elon Musk, most people either don't know who these people are or don't care. And if they do go full EM, then most people still don't care and it's still profitable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago* Yeah, they want money and clout permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 9 points 11 months ago (1 child) More tiktok than vine, really permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago You're not wrong, but an arbitrary maximum video length is the least of my problems with a Dorsey product permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago You're not wrong, but an arbitrary maximum video length is the least of my problems with a Dorsey product permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stephen01king@piefed.zip 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) But does it ban AI content? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (3 children) That would be based on the server's policies, same as Lemmy or Mastodon. I'd trust a federated environment a billion times more than anything Jack Dorsey is doing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mark@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Yeah, will never understand why these big billionaires keep taking these "we are for the people" stances, but are still trying to spin up these same ol for-profit, centralized products. If they really cared, they'd use that money to help nonprofits or decentralized services and stay out of the damn way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) It's because it's profitable, that's why they do it. As long as they don't Elon Musk, most people either don't know who these people are or don't care. And if they do go full EM, then most people still don't care and it's still profitable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago* Yeah, they want money and clout permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (3 children) That would be based on the server's policies, same as Lemmy or Mastodon. I'd trust a federated environment a billion times more than anything Jack Dorsey is doing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mark@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Yeah, will never understand why these big billionaires keep taking these "we are for the people" stances, but are still trying to spin up these same ol for-profit, centralized products. If they really cared, they'd use that money to help nonprofits or decentralized services and stay out of the damn way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) It's because it's profitable, that's why they do it. As long as they don't Elon Musk, most people either don't know who these people are or don't care. And if they do go full EM, then most people still don't care and it's still profitable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago* Yeah, they want money and clout permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mark@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Yeah, will never understand why these big billionaires keep taking these "we are for the people" stances, but are still trying to spin up these same ol for-profit, centralized products. If they really cared, they'd use that money to help nonprofits or decentralized services and stay out of the damn way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) It's because it's profitable, that's why they do it. As long as they don't Elon Musk, most people either don't know who these people are or don't care. And if they do go full EM, then most people still don't care and it's still profitable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago* Yeah, they want money and clout permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) It's because it's profitable, that's why they do it. As long as they don't Elon Musk, most people either don't know who these people are or don't care. And if they do go full EM, then most people still don't care and it's still profitable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago* Yeah, they want money and clout permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago* Yeah, they want money and clout permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 21 points 11 months ago TikTok but without users. permalink fedilink source parent