xkcd #3167: Car Size

Title text:

'They really shouldn't let those small cars drive in traffic. I worry I'm going to kill someone if I hit one! They should have to drive on the sidewalk, safely out of the way.'

Transcript:

Transcript will show once it’s been added to explainxkcd.com

Source: https://xkcd.com/3167/

explainxkcd for #3167

'They really shouldn't let those small cars drive in traffic. I worry I'm going to kill someone if I hit one! They should have to drive on the sidewalk, safely out of the way.'
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 1 year ago (19 children)

If I could have a Fully electric mid 90s chevy S10 style pickup with modern safety features and no surveillance I would be sooooo happy. But no, if I want a truck I can buy old as fuck or get a wanktank. Closest option to what I want in the US currently is a Ford Maverick (which is literally just a rebadged explorer sport trac for the modern age) but that would mean supporting Ford, and like, fuck Ford.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    What's crazy (and sucks) is they DID have an EV S10 from the mid 90's (hence why it sucks: it's exactly what you want, but they killed it)

    Of course it doesn't have the modern safety features, but I bet you could still find one if you're determined enough! Although it's possible you already knew this 😉

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_S-10_EV

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I had no idea, I'll have a to keep an eye out for those 👀

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Glad I could open your eyes! I have no idea how rare they are so it's possible you'll never see one (or you'll have to build one yourself maybe?)

    I only heard about them a day or two before commenting because of the recent EV1 auction! Turns out Jared from The Questionable Garage (formerly Wrench Every Day) got one driving again, which he brought up in his video talking about the EV1 auction

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    You're basically asking for what slate promises to be.

    Also, you totally didn't say it, but I feel like whining about it so: A lot of people think that the infotainment in cars could be stripped out to lower the price, but a big touch screen is actually very cheap and it might even be more expensive to have a bunch of bespoke buttons per model, so really, the idea of a gutted out vehicle wouldn't save any money. The only actual money savers would be in areas like the suspension, build quality, engine size, that sort of thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Perhaps, but having tactile options like buttons and dials is considerably safer as the ui can't change and you can keep your eyes on the road

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Perhaps, but having tactile options like buttons and dials is considerably safer as the ui can’t change and you can keep your eyes on the road

    Meh. Debatable.

    I think a few crucial buttons and a screen is most safe. To have all the modern features and settings of a normal car and have buttons alone would leave you with a 747 cockpit you have to look at anyways, and you'd have to cover more area to find things.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Correct me if I'm wrong, is Slate not Amazon backed? No judgement either way, I just know that rubs some lemmings the wrong way

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Oh don't worry, it isn't! Its just backed by Jeff Bezos himself.......

    Yeah......

    This world sucks, and sometimes you gotta make some shitty pragmatic choices. I would judge someone harshly for a Tesla but less so for Slate given that 1. Jeff isn't so openly racist so much as being a greedy bastard of a human being, and 2. Slate is backed by him but not fully owned by him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Ah the fun of the world we live in...

    Yeah 100%, I'm fully on board with your reasoning. I'm continuously arguing with myself over a Bronco or a Tacoma (only modern backcontry capable vehicles with manuals I'm aware of), so I do NOT have a moral high ground here haha

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You don't need software developers for a button

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    While you do not need software devs for a button, once you have enough buttons doing enough things controlling them with a computer becomes much easier than controlling them using mechanical circuitry. This is the whole reason for SBCs like the Arduino, so people can make the transitionary step between "my project is simple enough to have physical logic built into it" and "my project is so complex it no longer makes sense for me to hand build the logic"

    If you haven't messed with physical logic gates before, I recommend it! If you don't have a physical workspace to do it in, Minecraft actually Makes a 'great' sandbox for playing with logic circuits. Superflat Creative worlds are the bomb for that.

    Start with a simple yes gate, then learn a not gate, then an And, then an Or, and build up from there!

    You'll find very quickly that once you need persistence involved, projects with physical logic can scale massively with each additional bit of storage added. Doing something with that storage? Good luck! As a result, nowadays we pay someone for a tiny computer they already made, and program it to make our buttons do stuff, instead of just having the buttons do stuff directly.

    Edit: removed a word, analog does not mean mechanical, mea culpa.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    You need someone to figure out how to get the car to interpret that button press. Whether it's an electrical engineer or a dev doesn't make too much difference to the argument.

    the software route actually makes a bit more sense at scale, as you can abstract all the same functions into the car's computer regardless of what human interface device is activating that function.

  • source
  • parent