▲ 1165 ▼ xkcd #3167: Car Size (imgs.xkcd.com) submitted 1 year ago by xkcdbot@lemmy.world [B] to c/xkcd@lemmy.world 132 comments fedilink hide all child comments xkcd #3167: Car Size Title text: 'They really shouldn't let those small cars drive in traffic. I worry I'm going to kill someone if I hit one! They should have to drive on the sidewalk, safely out of the way.' Transcript: Transcript will show once it’s been added to explainxkcd.com Source: https://xkcd.com/3167/ explainxkcd for #3167
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 152 points 1 year ago (8 children) Just gonna keep on posting this permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (3 children) I should get an M1 Abrams and write off as a business expense permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago It would probably be quieter than any of the diesel pickup trucks on the road too! permalink fedilink source parent [–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) I remember hearing years ago how the M1 Abrams was a battlefield domination machine that could only be killed by another M1. That was clearly propaganda. Those overweight, overpriced pieces of shit got lit the fuck up after being shipped to Ukraine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago Russian invasion of ukraine has been the only war in quite a long time where a major power has been fighting against a major power. most other conflicts in many decades have been asymmetrical warfare/symmetrical warfare between outdated militaries. Ukraine has shown that drones are the new thing in warfare, they provide excellent intel, cheap short range pinpoint accurate light artillery. unmatched spotting for heavier artillery and with a bit more expense long range strategic strikes are also possible. With drone warfare MBTs seem to be mostly just the juiciest of targets. Where previously M1 could be resistant to most attacks, now with drone spotting a direct hit with guided shells can score a direct hit of 155mm shell on top armour of tanks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 year ago (1 child) "Your honor, I got the M1 because it was safer than an F150 in my neighborhood with lots of small children." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stelelor@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago "And here is the data to prove it." audience gasps permalink fedilink source parent [–] dwemthy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* A 0.2m tall 3 year old?? nope, reading comprehension, that's distance permalink fedilink source parent [–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago I've driven a Volvo L120H. It had. A pretty great visibility forward, better than my own car (Peugeot 108) lol. But that's due to sitting so high up and only when I took the front loader off. Backwards it had a camera, which I was so jelly of when backing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (3 children) I should get an M1 Abrams and write off as a business expense permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago It would probably be quieter than any of the diesel pickup trucks on the road too! permalink fedilink source parent [–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) I remember hearing years ago how the M1 Abrams was a battlefield domination machine that could only be killed by another M1. That was clearly propaganda. Those overweight, overpriced pieces of shit got lit the fuck up after being shipped to Ukraine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago Russian invasion of ukraine has been the only war in quite a long time where a major power has been fighting against a major power. most other conflicts in many decades have been asymmetrical warfare/symmetrical warfare between outdated militaries. Ukraine has shown that drones are the new thing in warfare, they provide excellent intel, cheap short range pinpoint accurate light artillery. unmatched spotting for heavier artillery and with a bit more expense long range strategic strikes are also possible. With drone warfare MBTs seem to be mostly just the juiciest of targets. Where previously M1 could be resistant to most attacks, now with drone spotting a direct hit with guided shells can score a direct hit of 155mm shell on top armour of tanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago It would probably be quieter than any of the diesel pickup trucks on the road too! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) I remember hearing years ago how the M1 Abrams was a battlefield domination machine that could only be killed by another M1. That was clearly propaganda. Those overweight, overpriced pieces of shit got lit the fuck up after being shipped to Ukraine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago Russian invasion of ukraine has been the only war in quite a long time where a major power has been fighting against a major power. most other conflicts in many decades have been asymmetrical warfare/symmetrical warfare between outdated militaries. Ukraine has shown that drones are the new thing in warfare, they provide excellent intel, cheap short range pinpoint accurate light artillery. unmatched spotting for heavier artillery and with a bit more expense long range strategic strikes are also possible. With drone warfare MBTs seem to be mostly just the juiciest of targets. Where previously M1 could be resistant to most attacks, now with drone spotting a direct hit with guided shells can score a direct hit of 155mm shell on top armour of tanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago Russian invasion of ukraine has been the only war in quite a long time where a major power has been fighting against a major power. most other conflicts in many decades have been asymmetrical warfare/symmetrical warfare between outdated militaries. Ukraine has shown that drones are the new thing in warfare, they provide excellent intel, cheap short range pinpoint accurate light artillery. unmatched spotting for heavier artillery and with a bit more expense long range strategic strikes are also possible. With drone warfare MBTs seem to be mostly just the juiciest of targets. Where previously M1 could be resistant to most attacks, now with drone spotting a direct hit with guided shells can score a direct hit of 155mm shell on top armour of tanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 year ago (1 child) "Your honor, I got the M1 because it was safer than an F150 in my neighborhood with lots of small children." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stelelor@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago "And here is the data to prove it." audience gasps permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stelelor@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago "And here is the data to prove it." audience gasps permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dwemthy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* A 0.2m tall 3 year old?? nope, reading comprehension, that's distance permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago I've driven a Volvo L120H. It had. A pretty great visibility forward, better than my own car (Peugeot 108) lol. But that's due to sitting so high up and only when I took the front loader off. Backwards it had a camera, which I was so jelly of when backing permalink fedilink source parent