cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/37527321

A Chinese woman known as the "Bitcoin Queen" was sentenced in London to 11 years and eight months in jail for laundering Bitcoin from a £5.5 billion ($7.3 billion) cryptocurrency investment scheme. [...]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
be elderly

If by saying "be elderly" you mean "being cognitively compromised by natural aging", then sure I can see that, but usually those that have massed that level of wealth have people to shield them from these kind of scams. Still, on this list this one I agree is the most likely.

have no human contact

I seems like a very rare use case for someone to have $300,000 in liquid assets/cash that would not have human contact. I'm not saying its impossible, but it seems like the confluence of those two things would be extremely rare.

someone acts like they really love you

I would think someone asking you for $300,000 would be a sign they don't really love you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    TBH $300k isn't that much for a lifetime of savings. That's a nice house and maybe 1 year of top salary.

    It's not like a million or two

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Everything is relative. Top salaries you're referring to are a very small fraction of workers today. For many $300k is indeed a life savings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment