▲ 5 ▼ “Bitcoin Queen” gets 11 years in prison for $7.3 billion Bitcoin scam (www.bleepingcomputer.com) submitted 1 year ago by Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one to c/buttcoin@lemmy.world 10 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/37527321 A Chinese woman known as the "Bitcoin Queen" was sentenced in London to 11 years and eight months in jail for laundering Bitcoin from a £5.5 billion ($7.3 billion) cryptocurrency investment scheme. [...]
[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) be elderly have no human contact someone acts like they really love you Don't judge people at their weakest being preyed on by the most cynical permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) be elderly If by saying "be elderly" you mean "being cognitively compromised by natural aging", then sure I can see that, but usually those that have massed that level of wealth have people to shield them from these kind of scams. Still, on this list this one I agree is the most likely. have no human contact I seems like a very rare use case for someone to have $300,000 in liquid assets/cash that would not have human contact. I'm not saying its impossible, but it seems like the confluence of those two things would be extremely rare. someone acts like they really love you I would think someone asking you for $300,000 would be a sign they don't really love you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) TBH $300k isn't that much for a lifetime of savings. That's a nice house and maybe 1 year of top salary. It's not like a million or two permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Everything is relative. Top salaries you're referring to are a very small fraction of workers today. For many $300k is indeed a life savings. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago Just saying For an elderly person today (ofc these were victims ~3-4 years ago now), it's not all that surprising to (a) have amassed $300k net worth, and (b) give it away to scammer because people crave human connection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) be elderly If by saying "be elderly" you mean "being cognitively compromised by natural aging", then sure I can see that, but usually those that have massed that level of wealth have people to shield them from these kind of scams. Still, on this list this one I agree is the most likely. have no human contact I seems like a very rare use case for someone to have $300,000 in liquid assets/cash that would not have human contact. I'm not saying its impossible, but it seems like the confluence of those two things would be extremely rare. someone acts like they really love you I would think someone asking you for $300,000 would be a sign they don't really love you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) TBH $300k isn't that much for a lifetime of savings. That's a nice house and maybe 1 year of top salary. It's not like a million or two permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Everything is relative. Top salaries you're referring to are a very small fraction of workers today. For many $300k is indeed a life savings. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago Just saying For an elderly person today (ofc these were victims ~3-4 years ago now), it's not all that surprising to (a) have amassed $300k net worth, and (b) give it away to scammer because people crave human connection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) TBH $300k isn't that much for a lifetime of savings. That's a nice house and maybe 1 year of top salary. It's not like a million or two permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Everything is relative. Top salaries you're referring to are a very small fraction of workers today. For many $300k is indeed a life savings. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago Just saying For an elderly person today (ofc these were victims ~3-4 years ago now), it's not all that surprising to (a) have amassed $300k net worth, and (b) give it away to scammer because people crave human connection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Everything is relative. Top salaries you're referring to are a very small fraction of workers today. For many $300k is indeed a life savings. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago Just saying For an elderly person today (ofc these were victims ~3-4 years ago now), it's not all that surprising to (a) have amassed $300k net worth, and (b) give it away to scammer because people crave human connection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago Just saying For an elderly person today (ofc these were victims ~3-4 years ago now), it's not all that surprising to (a) have amassed $300k net worth, and (b) give it away to scammer because people crave human connection permalink fedilink source parent