you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 94 points 1 year ago (24 children)

And it will last til Gabe dies. Then I guarantee it enshittifes so fast it will make your head spin.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 69 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    As long Valve doesn’t become publicly traded they will be fine. The problems start when companies optimize for shareholder value rather than customer value.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    You think there aren't a bunch of greedy finance whores biding their time until Gabe dies in order to take over and enshitify everything so they can squeeze as much money out of Steam as possible?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Na. Even privatly traded companies can enshittify when it gets inherited to people not sharing the same vision as the one that made the company successful.

    If you want to prevent enshittification more long term, convert it to a non-profit cooperative, with a work ethic that promotes providing the best service over short term profit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    That would be amaze balls, but hard to see happening in reality.

    How cool would it be if Steam split* into a non-profit, giving rebates back to developers for platform fees collected in excess of costs (including generous salaries for their employees, of course) with directives to make the platform as good for gamers and developers as possible?

    One can dream.

    • I'm assuming a split because game development and sales don't really mesh with a non-profit in the same way. Hard to make competitive multiplayer-only live-service games (let alone The International for DOTA 2) and loot crates your business model that way, at any rate.
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    You're right that going public would virtually guarantee they enshittify, but staying private does not guarantee they remain customer focused. It's still a business, and right now the only thing making it so good for customers, IMHO, is an ideological vision that favours long term stability, and steady profits. That is not the norm in the business world (of tech platforms).

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Maybe. I've heard Gabe's son is set to take over when the time comes, hopefully he's been raised right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Hmm. The founder's son usually just squeezes the company for profit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    points to all of human history

    Maybe this will be one of the exceptions. At least I hope so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    There are millions of successful companies and businesses on this planet and a lot (historically almost all) are taken over by the children or protégés. I‘d argue that nepo babies who got pampered up until adulthood (like probably Gabe‘s kids) have a worse track record of leading a business, that’s probably the examples you’ve been thinking of.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    He should turn it into a non-profit right before he dies and put the ip under a foundation or something so it can’t be sold off in pieces.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)