you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The fact that you're comparing Wayland to XFCE tells us you're not entirely sure what you're doing. One is a compositor and the other is a desktop environment.

Your problems are with GNOME. I dont even think you could define what X11 and Wayland are based on your posts, much less articulate why one is better than the other

Start by reading about Wayland. Don't make shit up and defend a position you can't even articulate. It's cringe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children)
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I'm literally reading your posts and responding to your words.

    The real issue is that even today, some apps (Firefox, gedit, some terminals) don't adjust their scaling to the new screen

    This shows you dont know what fractional scaling is otherwise you would have used the term.

    I work in Linux as a daily driver for work and personal. I don't care what the tools are, but they need to work and stay out of the way. Right now, Wayland implementation of multi monitor for my hardware is too much bother, I'll try it again in a year.

    This is you being stubborn because you're justifying your inaction based on false manufactured premises.

    I have no objections to Wayland itself, but I value the kind of stability xfce gives me, which is stable, predictable, and gets out of the way. Right now, on my hardware, Wayland/gnome is not there.

    This shows you don't understand what Wayland is because you compared a compositor protocol to a desktop environment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)