you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 86 points 1 year ago (7 children)

14kB club: “Amateurs!!!”

https://dev.to/shadowfaxrodeo/why-your-website-should-be-under-14kb-in-size-398n

a 14kB page can load much faster than a 15kB page — maybe 612ms faster — while the difference between a 15kB and a 16kB page is trivial.

This is because of the TCP slow start algorithm. This article will cover what that is, how it works, and why you should care.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Something something QUIC something something

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I actually read the link and they mention QUIC

    there is a notion that HTTP/3 and QUIC will do away with the 14kB rule — this is not true. QUIC recommends the same 14kB rule.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Damn I was actually gonna add more context to my original comment about how QUIC is an overrated in place UDP upgrade for HTTP, but I didn't wanna open my mouth because I haven't read the QUIC spec.

    Thank you for this lol

    spoilerSliding windows are for losers, spam packets at gigabit rates or go home /s

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Is it just the HTML that should be under 14kb? I think script, CSS, and image (except embedded SVGs) are separate requests? So these should individually be under 14kb to get the benefit?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments