324
Keep Android Open (keepandroidopen.org)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Keep Android Open

In August 2025, Google announced that starting next year, it will no longer be possible to develop apps for the Android platform without first registering centrally with Google.

This registration will involve:

  • Paying a fee to Google
  • Agreeing to Google’s Terms and Conditions
  • Providing government identification
  • Uploading evidence of an app’s private signing key
  • Listing all current and future application identifiers

Sign the open letter. And get active to help oppose the enactment of the policy in other ways listed on the website. Are there any more ways to oppose this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

I agree; the best option is to ditch Android ... those who can do it. Some Banking apps, public transport ticket apps, and post/mail-delivery apps seem to be a hard requirement for people in real live though. Which leads to the question: But what about people who can not ditch their phones and can not afford multiple devices (this decade)? Maybe laws that introduce a hard requirement that everything should work through a (open source) web-browser can help, but then what about "offline" use cases?

It feels like we are building our own digital prison in real time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago*

    There really should be a focus on government-level efforts in the EU, to force mobile manufacturers to standardise and open source all firmware sold in its jurisdiction. All OSS mobile OS's (not on custom OSS hardware) rely on Android solutions because mobile hardware is bespoke, closed source, and non-standard from device to device; the opposite to the PC ecosystem that enabled Linux. The Apple/Android duopoly won't be broken if mobile hardware vendors can continue creating custom closed-source firmware for their hardware, and there's simply no reason to allow this anti-competitiveness to continue.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent