Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday accused the Trump administration of “rigging the election” by dispatching federal poll monitors to five California counties, as voters cast ballots on Newsom’s Proposition 50 redistricting measure.

The Department of Justice announced Friday that it would deploy personnel to polling sites in Fresno, Kern, Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside counties to “ensure transparency, ballot security, and compliance with federal law,” ahead of the state’s Nov. 4 special election.

In an interview with KQED’s Political Breakdown, Newsom said the move was a “setup” for the Trump administration to cast doubt on the potential victory of Proposition 50 — a plan to redraw the state’s congressional district lines to advantage Democrats.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 49 points 1 year ago (21 children)

2026 is going to be madness. And if Democrats don’t take the house, 2028 will be the end.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    We are commenting on a thread about the current president openly interfering in state elections. It can be assumed the elections will be compromised.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's not a binary issue. Elections have been getting more and more compromised for decades. 2026 will be even more compromised. They will not be entirely compromised, and we have to keep working from the assumption that they won't be unwinnable, even while preparing for the possibility that we might not win them.

    Honestly, I fear that Democrats are more responsible for hurting their chances than Republicans. Even as bad as things have gotten, the Democratic establishment has continued to dig in and refuse to give any ground whatsoever to progressives. It's becoming a real mask-off moment for a lot of rank and file liberals.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Looks like the Russian bots have gotten to lemmy. Fuck outta here with your literal Russian bot propaganda talking point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    States are responsible for elections, not the feds

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    So far. Trump is already threatening to change this by sending troops to cities to enforce his election rules.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    Constitution says no and states get to enforce that no

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    Are you a time traveler that has skipped past the last 9 months? Trump doesn’t care what the constitution says or about states rights. He’s sending trips in against the will of the governors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    You have no idea how few the federal troops really are, you think they're more powerful than they are because you've only seen reports on where they've been striking performatively.

    If Trump sent every federal agent they had into New York city, the city could dedicate less than half of their police force to arrest them all. They wouldn't need to call the national guard, or any other security forces.

    And then there's no feds left to try anything in any other state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Obviously that’s now how it’s going to work. They will strategically send them to polling places where the margins between democrats and republicans is close enough. Send 10 guardsmen and 3 ICE agents to each of these polling places and that may be all it takes to keep the house in 2026.

    Below article tells you the 27 districts they will focus on first. How many guardsmen and ICE agents would you need to make any impact on 27 districts?

    https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/competitive-districts-will-decide-control-house

    Edit: that link was from 2024 btw. 2026 probably has a new set of districts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Only the smaller states are at any real risk, and only if they don't cooperate with the larger democratic states to place troops to protect the sites

    There's more than enough available to the states if they decide to enforce safety that the feds simply can't do anything

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Are you just describing a full on civil war? There’s not going to be any states protecting other states.

    Some of the competitive districts will be in republican states, so they’ll invite the military in (Gov Lee of TN doing this already in Memphis).

    For other states, they will need to decide how much they want to escalate the confrontation with the federal government. Places like Arizona or Arkansas may not be able to at all.

    And, Republicans only need to win enough seats to maintain the house after their redistricting BS.

    Anyway, I hope I’m only describing a sci-fi/fantasy movie, but seeing the lack of respect Trump has for democracy already, I am not that hopeful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    No, I'm describing sending armed security that outnumber what the feds try to send.

    If the feds think they still can instigate shit when outnumbered, they might end up starting a civil war - but the states wouldn't start it.

    There's already other stuff like the health compacts in place between some states. Voting safety compacts might also happen

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    No shit Nate. Y'all need to update your talking points, that one doesn't hold water anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Who's the one with talking points? Because that one's from the constitution. Push the states to oppose Trump's interference

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago

    I’m pretty sure we’ve crossed that rubicon, the last election was just that. Cross your fingers if you must, but I don’t believe for one second that votes matter anymore in the “united” states.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Stop relying on elections to save you. You can't vote your way out of fascism. The only way out is through mass civil unrest. Strikes, blackouts, protests.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    But that point of contention is too important. Dems need to take the house in order to build the narrative that precedes the unrest. It's going to be a lot harder to send that message if they appear too unpopular to do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    That's why they need to control the media narratives.
    And why they want to make negative opinions of the regime illegal.
    Once they've made it illegal and can control the media they now have created an environment of fear where no one even trusts their neighbor.
    The knock on effect is that it is now harder to organize resistance because even expressing dissent has been outlawed.

  • source
  • parent