▲ 180 ▼ What's a service you’ve been using forever that hasn’t enshitified? (lemmy.dbzer0.com) submitted 1 year ago by Davy_Jones@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml 206 comments fedilink hide all child comments We all know the struggle of beloved services slowly going downhill. What’s one service, tool, or website you’ve been using for years that’s still great and hasn’t turned to crap?
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 184 points 1 year ago (12 children) Wikipedia. Though I could do without the endless donation blockups. permalink fedilink source hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] nfreak@lemmy.ml 104 points 1 year ago (5 children) I can forgive Wikipedia and Internet Archive for the spam. Both sites are incredibly valuable and completely ad-free. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 17 points 1 year ago* (4 children) They are one of the highest achievements of humanity, imho, that even make me feel proud to be a human. It's hard not to try to support them. The "spam" is for them to operate, not maximise their profits. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] QuizzaciousOtter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (3 children) It's not that simple and transparent actually. Wikipedia doesn't really need those donations to operate. They have money reserves for many years of expenses. I don't have a great source right now but this article looks decent. I didn't read the whole thing though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PmMeFrogMemes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) Gotcha, it's another anti-European (and anti-USA), anti-male, quasi-Marxist organization. This is what your donations to Wikipedia are going to. Wikipedia spends more money on left-wing causes than actually running an encyclopedia, and by a very long-shot. Well shit, I guess I'll start donating permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuizzaciousOtter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I see nothing wrong with that. I just think it's fair to say the way they ask for donations is at least a little bit disingenuous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PmMeFrogMemes@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago yeah agreed permalink fedilink source parent [–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago I came here to say both of those things about the Internet Archive, but I also hope both of those orgs get tons of donations regularly because I wouldn't want to live in a world without them permalink fedilink source parent [–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago (1 child) I just pay the 52$ once a year and know I've done my part for knowledge. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Inaminate_Carbon_Rod@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago You know what? I’m gonna start doing that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] threeduck@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago You can login and it'll stop with the pop ups for a year. permalink fedilink source parent [–] solrize@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago It's not just the spam, there is other enshittification like the endless co-option with AI companies and private info disclosure (aka surveillance capitalism) under the self-serving excuse of being anonymized or aggregated. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SatyrSack 5 points 1 year ago Just found these custom ad block filters. Seems to be working so far wikipedia.org##.nag-trigger wikipedia.org###centralNotice wikipedia.org##[id$=“banner-nag”] wikipedia.org###frb-inline wikipedia.org##.cn-fundraising permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nfreak@lemmy.ml 104 points 1 year ago (5 children) I can forgive Wikipedia and Internet Archive for the spam. Both sites are incredibly valuable and completely ad-free. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 17 points 1 year ago* (4 children) They are one of the highest achievements of humanity, imho, that even make me feel proud to be a human. It's hard not to try to support them. The "spam" is for them to operate, not maximise their profits. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] QuizzaciousOtter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (3 children) It's not that simple and transparent actually. Wikipedia doesn't really need those donations to operate. They have money reserves for many years of expenses. I don't have a great source right now but this article looks decent. I didn't read the whole thing though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PmMeFrogMemes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) Gotcha, it's another anti-European (and anti-USA), anti-male, quasi-Marxist organization. This is what your donations to Wikipedia are going to. Wikipedia spends more money on left-wing causes than actually running an encyclopedia, and by a very long-shot. Well shit, I guess I'll start donating permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuizzaciousOtter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I see nothing wrong with that. I just think it's fair to say the way they ask for donations is at least a little bit disingenuous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PmMeFrogMemes@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago yeah agreed permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 17 points 1 year ago* (4 children) They are one of the highest achievements of humanity, imho, that even make me feel proud to be a human. It's hard not to try to support them. The "spam" is for them to operate, not maximise their profits. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] QuizzaciousOtter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (3 children) It's not that simple and transparent actually. Wikipedia doesn't really need those donations to operate. They have money reserves for many years of expenses. I don't have a great source right now but this article looks decent. I didn't read the whole thing though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PmMeFrogMemes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) Gotcha, it's another anti-European (and anti-USA), anti-male, quasi-Marxist organization. This is what your donations to Wikipedia are going to. Wikipedia spends more money on left-wing causes than actually running an encyclopedia, and by a very long-shot. Well shit, I guess I'll start donating permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuizzaciousOtter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I see nothing wrong with that. I just think it's fair to say the way they ask for donations is at least a little bit disingenuous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PmMeFrogMemes@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago yeah agreed permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuizzaciousOtter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (3 children) It's not that simple and transparent actually. Wikipedia doesn't really need those donations to operate. They have money reserves for many years of expenses. I don't have a great source right now but this article looks decent. I didn't read the whole thing though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PmMeFrogMemes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) Gotcha, it's another anti-European (and anti-USA), anti-male, quasi-Marxist organization. This is what your donations to Wikipedia are going to. Wikipedia spends more money on left-wing causes than actually running an encyclopedia, and by a very long-shot. Well shit, I guess I'll start donating permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuizzaciousOtter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I see nothing wrong with that. I just think it's fair to say the way they ask for donations is at least a little bit disingenuous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PmMeFrogMemes@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago yeah agreed permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PmMeFrogMemes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) Gotcha, it's another anti-European (and anti-USA), anti-male, quasi-Marxist organization. This is what your donations to Wikipedia are going to. Wikipedia spends more money on left-wing causes than actually running an encyclopedia, and by a very long-shot. Well shit, I guess I'll start donating permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuizzaciousOtter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I see nothing wrong with that. I just think it's fair to say the way they ask for donations is at least a little bit disingenuous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PmMeFrogMemes@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago yeah agreed permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuizzaciousOtter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I see nothing wrong with that. I just think it's fair to say the way they ask for donations is at least a little bit disingenuous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PmMeFrogMemes@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago yeah agreed permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago I came here to say both of those things about the Internet Archive, but I also hope both of those orgs get tons of donations regularly because I wouldn't want to live in a world without them permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago (1 child) I just pay the 52$ once a year and know I've done my part for knowledge. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Inaminate_Carbon_Rod@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago You know what? I’m gonna start doing that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Inaminate_Carbon_Rod@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago You know what? I’m gonna start doing that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] threeduck@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago You can login and it'll stop with the pop ups for a year. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago It's not just the spam, there is other enshittification like the endless co-option with AI companies and private info disclosure (aka surveillance capitalism) under the self-serving excuse of being anonymized or aggregated. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SatyrSack 5 points 1 year ago Just found these custom ad block filters. Seems to be working so far wikipedia.org##.nag-trigger wikipedia.org###centralNotice wikipedia.org##[id$=“banner-nag”] wikipedia.org###frb-inline wikipedia.org##.cn-fundraising permalink fedilink source parent