you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 170 points 1 year ago (13 children)

It's never happened before because the working class has never been unified nationwide before. Soybean farmers in Utah are not connected to teachers in Boston or steelworkers in Pittsburgh or auto manufacturers in Michigan or nurses in San Diego. There's never been a singular cause that affected all of those groups of people at the same time.

If it ever could happen, it would be because the President was a colossal dipshit who fucked every aspect of the economy across the country, except that would almost certainly cause the legislature to put an end to such rampant and corrupt tyranny.

Right?

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    no, the official party platform of the GOOP is “whatever Drumpf says”.
    this party also controls the legislature

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The last time people across the country organized general strike of sorts the government went into action to make a law that made it illegal for unions to organize such a thing.

    And with this corrupt Congress and this idiot president and this ridiculous SCOTUS, I think it's likely they will worm their way into making a law that makes it illegal for any citizen to strike for any reason.

    Trump already illegally outlawed government unions. And nothing, absolutely nothing, was done about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The people strike.

    Congress says: that's illegal now!! Go back to work!

    Why the fuck would we? Literally what could possibly convince people that the gov is going to arrest a million people for striking? Genuinely, how braindead are people that that is a concern?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I would suggest you not underestimate just how unbelievably stupid our current president is and how likely he is to actually use the United States army against its own people regardless of how legal or illegal it actually is. Not to mention his sycophantic Congress that will blithely stand by and let him do whatever the fuck he wants. This is what corruption looks like.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    There’s never been a singular cause that affected all of those groups of people at the same time.

    The attack on Pearl Harbor and 9/11 were both pretty unifying. The former had an immediate and unambiguous opponent with Imperial Japan. 9/11 took weeks and months to figure out what happened and who did it, so it didn't have as immediate a response.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago*

    For sure, there have been events that affected all Americans in various ways, good and bad, but the context of the conversation is events that would encourage a general labor strike. The moon landing, world wars, the Great Depression, the Macarena, big things happen. I probably could have been clearer by saying that nothing in history has unified the American working class as a singular political group to use our power as a labor force to exert pressure to stop oligarchical abuses by means of a general strike, but that seems overly pedantic.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -12 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm seriously curious, why do you imply they aren't?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Interesting. I can certainly see the distinction. Does that make them part of the middle class?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • But what class are they? Or are you saying they are a class themselves?

    That said, most small business owners I know work way to hard and end up with very little in the end. It is hard to compete with the large corporations. But in the past, if the area they lived in experienced significant growth, they often made a killing on the business property alone. Farmers don't really have that since they live on the business property.

    Kinda feels like they should be their own class really. Though I suppose there is a big difference between farmers who own their land, and the ones where the bank essentially owns it... and they just pay rent with no real hope of wver paying it off.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yes, farmers do labor to produce things. That makes them workers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    "Farmer" has come to mean the corporate owner of fields in which crops are grown, rather than the people waking up at the ass crack of dawn to tend to the fields and bring in the harvest.

    "Farm workers" are now the ones doing all the labor.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)