422
Framework supporting far-right racists? (community.frame.work)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
399 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Title of the (concerning) thread on their community forum, not voluntary clickbait. Came across the thread thanks to a toot by @Khrys@mamot.fr (French speaking)

The gist of the issue raised by OP is that framework sponsors and promotes projects lead by known toxic and racists people (DHH among them).

I agree with the point made by the OP :

The “big tent” argument works fine if everyone plays by some basic civil rules of understanding. Stuff like code of conducts, moderation, anti-racism, surely those things we agree on? A big tent won’t work if you let in people that want to exterminate the others.

I'm disappointed in framework's answer so far

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Projects are not their authors. Please give the politics a rest. I've had enough of politics lately.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    you can give politics a rest, but politics won't give you a rest. especially if you are gay, trans, black, or in any of those marginalized groups.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Amen. I get the sentiment but Jesus Christ everything is politics when you boil it down. Yes it's draining to focus on it 24/7 but it's equally destructive to bury your head in the sand.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago

    Wether you like it or not, some people don't have the luxury to stop fighting, even more so right now with so-called democratic governments that brutalize, lock up and torture people for their opinions, their sexuality or their skin color.

    Ignore these debates if you wish, and disconnect from social networks if you need to rest. But don’t call for people to stop fighting when their very existence is put at risk by people like DHH, that Framework decided to support.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It's become all about purity testing. From both the right and the left. And since any purity test can be anything that anyone wants it be, everyone is guaranteed to fail it at some point. And because the internet never forgets, something you said 20 years ago now is grounds for being purged. Without any thought to what that person now believes and how they think.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    Is this situation relevant to that example? Are the people in question changed since the time in which the accusations were made?

    Rebranding personal ethics and morals as "a purity test" is disingenuous at best.

    If you're going to take umbridge with someone's approach at least do it directly instead of this backhanded high horse bullshit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    I've been thinking similar things. Maybe online platforms, including Lemmy, can be a bit unhealthy.

    In the real world, if you say something a bit embarrassing in front of one person, they'll probably forget it after a while. Years later, nobody knows you said it. But on Lemmy, if I tell one person my opinion on a topic, that opinion exists on my profile for the rest of time, unless I delete the comment or my profile.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • load more comments (1 reply)