you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

Machine learning sure, but an llm? For anything other then as a module to translate abstract data into words that just seem weird

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Well I'm sure you know more than the scientists at Stanford university.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I am not saying i understand it at all. My comment is genuine, not rhetorical.

    On the contrary i express that i do not understand this to the point of deeming it strange or weird, triggering my curiosity.

    I was hoping someone would chime in an explain how text generator techniques (which i do know alot about) known to have no capacity to use real world reason or logic can be used to help solve dna puzzles unless as a sub module of general machine learning. In which that later case would be within my understanding

  • source
  • parent