you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Do you think you would have that opinion if you ran arch on mission critical production servers for a couple of years?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Well, for the sake of clarity, lets separate stability and reliability? Stability means unchanging. Reliable means it won't crash or behave in unexpected ways.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If you have a better word for the concept of unchanging functionality and interfaces, I'm open to using that in this context. In describing distros, I've only come across the word stable for this. Reliable is a wider concept to me, and also includes being relatively free of bugs. A stable distro can still be buggy, if it's the same bugs tomorrow as yesterday.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)