790
you can't make the system better by voting. our rights were taken by force, not given to us willingly. (anarchist.nexus)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
315 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
we can't just vote fascism away. the time has come to disobey. (be brave)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 35 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Voting is fine as long as you are aware that it does nothing to materially prevent fascism. It can't hurt anything to write something on a piece of paper. But the problem isnt really people like you. Its liberals who believe that voting is the be all end all of their political responsibility.

Electoral democracy is ultimately a misdirection. Capitalists are the actual sources of political power in western democracies. They unfortunately have a vested interest in the state getting more fascist and actually have the power to effect that change. So long as everyone looks down at the ballot box and then goes home to do nothing of material difference for the next 4 years, fascists will only continue to gain ground until they can do away with the misdirection of electoralism entirely.

Voting cannot be the only thing you do. Or you are effectively doing nothing. Which you seem to understand, but liberals do not. They actually want all other forms of political action banned. Because liberals ultimately protect capitalists, who are the real sources of political power. Leftist political action is a threat to capitalists. Thusly, liberals condemn it and recommend voting instead.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    What I'm saying is that not voting is foolish, not that voting is the only thing that should be done. In fact I'm saying that other things should be done. We clearly agree, I just think it is harmful to spread anti voting rhetoric because while it can't fix things it is still a meaningful thing that can be done with immediate consequences for many.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    We do agree. I only said anything in the first place because I didn't really see this post as advocating an anti-voting position. I would see anti-voting agitation as more along the lines of "Do not vote. Voting itself is harmful." As opposed to "voting doesn't work" or "voting is ineffective" which I see as more along the lines of criticism of electoral democracy and agitation for collective action.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    He did in an earlier post posted shortly before this one, and the title seems to reinforce this. The image itself doesn't.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [+] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    One post implied voting blue was voting for fascism, implying you shouldn't for the dems in the US. My point is that this is shortsighted and harmful. People should vote for the dems unless a third party is a viable alternative, they should also build up third parties to make them viable options, and they should also join political orgs and unionize, and do direct action.

    Ofc more than voting is needed, but the republicans are causing more harm than the dems would have by miles and contributing to more voter apathy is not the answer.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Voting is fine as long as you are aware that it does nothing to materially prevent fascism.

    There is no such thing as preventing fascism. It's a fight every generation has to win, no matter what government they live under. It's always about delay so we can fight it again tomorrow.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Its liberals who believe that voting is the be all end all of their political responsibility.

    I'll take a liberal who believes voting is the be all end all of their political responsibility over a "leftist" who believes not voting, and encouraging others not to vote, is the be all end all of their political responsibility.

    Electoral democracy is ultimately a misdirection. Capitalists are the actual sources of political power in western democracies.

    Yes, but a large source of that power is influencing electoral democracy. It does work, but all it does is reflect the choice of the people¹. It's just that the people have been manipulated into counterproductive choices for so long. A defeatist approach to voting is one of those choices.

    No, voting can't be the only thing you do. But it should be one of the things you do, and you should do it intelligently. Yes, we all want a more representative electoral mechanic, but until we get it we need to accept the properties of the field we're playing on and act accordingly.

    ¹ Gerrymandering, voter suppression, and all the other ways of skewing democracy away from the actual will of the people only proves the point further. They wouldn't be bothering with all that if elections didn't have power.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    all it does is reflect the choice of the people

    And when the choices are all false ones?

    "leftist" who believes not voting, and encouraging others not to vote, is the be all end all of their political responsibility.

    That's a strawman if I've ever seen one. Nobody saying that "electoralism is a sham" is saying that's the "be all end all of their political responsibility." They just generally have a broader definition of "political responsibility".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    And when the choices are all false ones?

    Yeah, that was exactly my point.

    Nobody saying that "electoralism is a sham" is saying that's the "be all end all of their political responsibility." They just generally have a broader definition of "political responsibility".

    Yeah that hasn't been my experience. Especially in the last election cycle, I saw a lot of that supposed strawman. No community engagement, no actual political engagement, no workplace engagement, just "Kamala bad". People who insisted that not voting or voting third party would send a message. Don't pretend they don't exist, I've talked to dozens.

    I stand by my statement. All else equal, a liberal who does nothing except vote Democrat is better by far than a "leftist" who does nothing except tell people not to vote Democrat.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yeah, that was exactly my point.

    I don't see it and that's why I asked. Could you clarify?

    People who insisted that not voting or voting third party would send a message.

    Ah, I misunderstood your classifications. I would definitely lump those people in with the "liberals who do nothing except vote" crowd, not the "electoralism is a scam" leftists.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Could you clarify?

    The claim was that electoral democracy was a misdirection, my point is that all the effort to manipulate it demonstrates that it is the seat of power, and the oligarchs have merely occupied it.

    I would definitely lump those people in with the "liberals who do nothing except vote" crowd

    Since they're defined by not voting, they aren't. They are, materially speaking, equivalent to anti-electoralists. The liberals are at least voting for plausible harm reduction.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    my point is that all the effort to manipulate it demonstrates that it is the seat of power

    That's not at all what I mean about it being a false choice.

    That's one hell of a hasty generalization. Putting effort into something doesn't make it materially valuable or useful. Lawns aren't a useful cash crop, valuable export or critical infrastructure despite the ludicrous amount of resources spent on maintaining them.

    Since they're defined by not voting, they aren't.

    Within the framework of a representative democracy not voting when you don't have representation is the same as voting for someone who isn't representative of your interests.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Within the framework of a representative democracy not voting when you don't have representation is the same as voting for someone who isn't representative of your interests.

    Within the framework of FPTP elections they are different. Voting against the person who is least representative, no matter how marginally, is better than not voting.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent