Technology

technology@lemmy.world

89,755 readers

13,866 active

3,634 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

Google's shocking developer decree struggles to justify the urgent threat to F-Droid (www.neowin.net)

submitted 1 year ago by ardi60@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

262 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I obviously don't know your situation, but using your own phone for work is a bit of a red flag. If you're required to use a phone for work, ideally the job should provide you one that meets their requirements.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Yeah, a mandatory work phone (where the employer can define requirements) should be purchased and funded by the employer.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Exactly.

My work only requires that I have their MFA. They don't care if it's rooted, it just needs to allow me to login. I'm guessing if I pushed back enough, they'd find an alternative.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I must assume they mean no use it for their business that they own. Otherwise I'll just be sad.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent