▲ 841 ▼ Rage inducing (lemmy.dbzer0.com) submitted 1 year ago by Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works 66 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 child) It somehow feels physically exhausting to intentionally slow down below my normal walking speed, because then I notice what my feet are doing instead of it being automatic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago I can't be fucked to find the graph but it's true. The relationship between speed and exhaustion is highly asymmetric, going 20 % slower than your default walk is much more tiring than going 20 % faster. It actually makes intuitive sense to anyone who hikes. Walking slow is like hiking downhill. You're fighting your body's natural cadence which requires extra energy that doesn't go anywhere useful. Going faster also uses extra energy but it's largely "useful" energy that spares steps. The extreme version of that line of thought is that I can run 10 km but not crawl 10 km. Also fast walkers tend to... walk a lot, it's a virtuous circle. It's fine if grandma does a lap around the mall at 2 km/h, but I've been walking all day and I have more places to walk to afterwards and I ain't doing all that at crawling pace. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 child) It somehow feels physically exhausting to intentionally slow down below my normal walking speed, because then I notice what my feet are doing instead of it being automatic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago I can't be fucked to find the graph but it's true. The relationship between speed and exhaustion is highly asymmetric, going 20 % slower than your default walk is much more tiring than going 20 % faster. It actually makes intuitive sense to anyone who hikes. Walking slow is like hiking downhill. You're fighting your body's natural cadence which requires extra energy that doesn't go anywhere useful. Going faster also uses extra energy but it's largely "useful" energy that spares steps. The extreme version of that line of thought is that I can run 10 km but not crawl 10 km. Also fast walkers tend to... walk a lot, it's a virtuous circle. It's fine if grandma does a lap around the mall at 2 km/h, but I've been walking all day and I have more places to walk to afterwards and I ain't doing all that at crawling pace. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago I can't be fucked to find the graph but it's true. The relationship between speed and exhaustion is highly asymmetric, going 20 % slower than your default walk is much more tiring than going 20 % faster. It actually makes intuitive sense to anyone who hikes. Walking slow is like hiking downhill. You're fighting your body's natural cadence which requires extra energy that doesn't go anywhere useful. Going faster also uses extra energy but it's largely "useful" energy that spares steps. The extreme version of that line of thought is that I can run 10 km but not crawl 10 km. Also fast walkers tend to... walk a lot, it's a virtuous circle. It's fine if grandma does a lap around the mall at 2 km/h, but I've been walking all day and I have more places to walk to afterwards and I ain't doing all that at crawling pace. permalink fedilink source parent