It often seems like insincere virtue signaling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Anyone being assassinated for political views, no matter how bad said views were, elicits sympathy automatically due to the long-term effects of political assassinations when there isn't an uprising going on. I don't see what's wrong with that, and confirmation bias finding additional "things" to have flimsier sympathies for is a thing. Also, "he was a Christian/man of faith" is something I only hear Christians say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    With how you put it, it sounds like the problem wasn't Kirk being assassinated. It's that there weren't more politically motivated deaths in a similar time frame, otherwise known as an "uprising" that would have normalized it.

    I think you're on to something.

  • source
  • parent