Too many people pearl clutching today over worries of retributive violence, as if the fascists aren't already going to be committing that violence on us in the near future regardless. It's not too early to say that this scumbag deserved much worse and I'm glad he got rocked so publicly. Mods I'll understand if you delete this and I'm truly sorry for the trouble if you do, I just need a personal break today from the media cacophony of liberals collectively reconciling with the realization that we live in an abnormally and horrifically violent society.

A meme image of Charlie Kirk with a tiny face featuring the text "Dear Liberals, if having access to firearms is a bad thing, then why is there a fountain of blood gushing from my neck?"
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't know a lot about him, I'm not US American.

I condemn violence in general but a person like him who helps polarize society, pours oil in the fire etc. may just reap what he sowed.

That's what you get, with culture war nonsense and playing sides of the political spectrum against each other. Strange to assume this would just stay rhetoric.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago*

    Main difference between him and someone else fueling the fire is the irony.

    He specifically supported people bringing guns to schools wiith quotes that essentially boil down to "Gun violence happens but we just have to live with it to protect our god given rights."

    He was the reason he could get shot.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    He sayd things like few gun related deaths each year is acceptable sacrifice if they can keep their god given right to bear arms. Also he said he does not understand empathy and it's just a made up new age term.

    So he most definetly got what he sowed, what he deserved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment