▲ 109 ▼ 'Cool data centres with treated sewage', says Anglian Water (www.bbc.com) submitted 1 year ago by Quilotoa@lemmy.ca to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world 13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago (6 children) Sure whatever. Heat exchanger is heat exchanger. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (5 children) ...until that one breaks. Then it's a shit storm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) I assume it's relatively clean, but not safe to drink Edit: I don't think the replies are really getting it. This sounds like a great use of minimally processed water with relatively small risk. It's much better to use this water than potable water for the same purpose, assuming water is going to be used no matter what. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago Depends on the amount of treatment steps it undergoes. Standard procedure is aimed at just removing solid debris and organic matter, to return clarified and chemically balanced water to nature, with no excess nutrients that could feed algae in water streams. From that point forward, it is just a question of how far the treatment can be taken. For reuse for cleaning, washing, etc? Maybe it just gets a minute dosage of sodium hypocloride. Highly sensible areas, like beaches or lakes? UV treatment, maybe followed by micro filtering. Extreme scenarios? Reverse osmosis. If the protocols in place are strong, it's safe. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) I always assumed the same... Turns out, a wastewater plant and treatment plant for drinking water look a lot more alike than I thought. I'm pretty sure you could drink it, you'd just want to do it far enough away that you don't have to think about where it came from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 2 points 1 year ago I used to put fences around shit sites…they do a number on your stomach for a while til you get used to it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 0 points 1 year ago Which means a leak would be "relatively clean" water getting all over the place. Just doesn't sound like a good idea. Also, are we talking using this water in chiller cooling towers, like most buildings use? So essentially heating that "relatively clean" liquid to about 100° or so (you know, a temp that microbes just love), and releasing it to the atmosphere. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (5 children) ...until that one breaks. Then it's a shit storm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) I assume it's relatively clean, but not safe to drink Edit: I don't think the replies are really getting it. This sounds like a great use of minimally processed water with relatively small risk. It's much better to use this water than potable water for the same purpose, assuming water is going to be used no matter what. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago Depends on the amount of treatment steps it undergoes. Standard procedure is aimed at just removing solid debris and organic matter, to return clarified and chemically balanced water to nature, with no excess nutrients that could feed algae in water streams. From that point forward, it is just a question of how far the treatment can be taken. For reuse for cleaning, washing, etc? Maybe it just gets a minute dosage of sodium hypocloride. Highly sensible areas, like beaches or lakes? UV treatment, maybe followed by micro filtering. Extreme scenarios? Reverse osmosis. If the protocols in place are strong, it's safe. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) I always assumed the same... Turns out, a wastewater plant and treatment plant for drinking water look a lot more alike than I thought. I'm pretty sure you could drink it, you'd just want to do it far enough away that you don't have to think about where it came from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 2 points 1 year ago I used to put fences around shit sites…they do a number on your stomach for a while til you get used to it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 0 points 1 year ago Which means a leak would be "relatively clean" water getting all over the place. Just doesn't sound like a good idea. Also, are we talking using this water in chiller cooling towers, like most buildings use? So essentially heating that "relatively clean" liquid to about 100° or so (you know, a temp that microbes just love), and releasing it to the atmosphere. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) I assume it's relatively clean, but not safe to drink Edit: I don't think the replies are really getting it. This sounds like a great use of minimally processed water with relatively small risk. It's much better to use this water than potable water for the same purpose, assuming water is going to be used no matter what. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago Depends on the amount of treatment steps it undergoes. Standard procedure is aimed at just removing solid debris and organic matter, to return clarified and chemically balanced water to nature, with no excess nutrients that could feed algae in water streams. From that point forward, it is just a question of how far the treatment can be taken. For reuse for cleaning, washing, etc? Maybe it just gets a minute dosage of sodium hypocloride. Highly sensible areas, like beaches or lakes? UV treatment, maybe followed by micro filtering. Extreme scenarios? Reverse osmosis. If the protocols in place are strong, it's safe. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) I always assumed the same... Turns out, a wastewater plant and treatment plant for drinking water look a lot more alike than I thought. I'm pretty sure you could drink it, you'd just want to do it far enough away that you don't have to think about where it came from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 2 points 1 year ago I used to put fences around shit sites…they do a number on your stomach for a while til you get used to it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 0 points 1 year ago Which means a leak would be "relatively clean" water getting all over the place. Just doesn't sound like a good idea. Also, are we talking using this water in chiller cooling towers, like most buildings use? So essentially heating that "relatively clean" liquid to about 100° or so (you know, a temp that microbes just love), and releasing it to the atmosphere. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago Depends on the amount of treatment steps it undergoes. Standard procedure is aimed at just removing solid debris and organic matter, to return clarified and chemically balanced water to nature, with no excess nutrients that could feed algae in water streams. From that point forward, it is just a question of how far the treatment can be taken. For reuse for cleaning, washing, etc? Maybe it just gets a minute dosage of sodium hypocloride. Highly sensible areas, like beaches or lakes? UV treatment, maybe followed by micro filtering. Extreme scenarios? Reverse osmosis. If the protocols in place are strong, it's safe. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) I always assumed the same... Turns out, a wastewater plant and treatment plant for drinking water look a lot more alike than I thought. I'm pretty sure you could drink it, you'd just want to do it far enough away that you don't have to think about where it came from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 2 points 1 year ago I used to put fences around shit sites…they do a number on your stomach for a while til you get used to it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 2 points 1 year ago I used to put fences around shit sites…they do a number on your stomach for a while til you get used to it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 0 points 1 year ago Which means a leak would be "relatively clean" water getting all over the place. Just doesn't sound like a good idea. Also, are we talking using this water in chiller cooling towers, like most buildings use? So essentially heating that "relatively clean" liquid to about 100° or so (you know, a temp that microbes just love), and releasing it to the atmosphere. permalink fedilink source parent