you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -46 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Calling Charlie Kirk a Nazi while celebrating his death. The irony. This whole thread should be locked.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Do you know what irony is? Or do you just not know what a Nazi is?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    The irony is a group of people cheering for a person that died because he had different beliefs and opinions, otherwise known as persecution of their opponents. A characteristic of Nazism.

    Defend this barbarism all you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Charlie Kirk spouted hate and bigotry and built a career out of it.

    He advocated for violence against trans and gay people.

    Not every human is a good person deep down inside. Charlie Kirk was a terrible person, an ally to the fascists, and advocating violence against minority groups.

    This is no simple different beliefs.

    He got what he advocated and deserved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Charlie Kirk has been actively making the world a worst place, calling violence against minority groups and tried normalizing school shootings.

    I think that Charlie Kirk got what he preached.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I'm confused as to why you think those things are incompatible.

    We've been celebrating the deaths of people for a very long time, including much cheering when bad people die.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactions_to_the_killing_of_Osama_bin_Laden

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    bin Laden was a common enemy of the United States. Kirk was an American and you're just tossing that aside just because you disagree with him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You keep handwaving Kirk being a moral monster who was actively making the nation and the world a significantly more hostile & dangerous place for millions of disadvantaged human beings as “You just disagree with him.” Why?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    you act like violent rhetoric is not a staple of right wing tactics. if the left does it the right does it at the very least just as much but I would bet money it's much more.

    are you conveniently forgetting the Minnesota shooter who impersonated a cop and had a whole political hit list? the far right is not innocent of violent rhetoric.

    since i don't hear about violent rhetoric nearly as much on the left i went to do some good-faith research. here's the best article i could find on violent rhetoric by political ideology: https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rise-of-political-violence-in-the-united-states/

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)