419
"I Hate This Viscerally": People Are REALLY Mad at These AI Glasses That Record Everything Constantly (futurism.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
87 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 66 points 1 year ago (15 children)

So I know what to look for in the future for people to avoid, the glasses apparently look like this:

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    And putting Ray Ban on the "never buy a fucking thing from" list.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You should go up the chain and put the parent company of the parent company and all the related properties there

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EssilorLuxottica

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Ray Ban's parent company is going to have AI glasses from all of the companies they own. I was boycotting Ray Ban up until I learned that it's really fucking difficult to find prescription sunglasses big enough for my giant head that can accommodate my very strong prescription and Ray Ban had the only pair that I could find.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Thats the wayfarer model, you'll never be able to tell, theyre too common

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You're missing the details:

    Regular wayfarer on the left has the small oval (sometimes chrome) accent. AI wayfarer on the right as the round black camera lenses.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You're going up close to every person you see with wayfarers to check the corner for a small oval? The details are too small to matter from a distance.That's what I'm trying to say.

    There will likely be other models or brands where you can't even rely on the distinction you're trying to make here.

    It's looking bleak.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    You’re going up close to every person you see with wayfarers to check the corner for a small oval? The details are too small to matter from a distance.That’s what I’m trying to say.

    No. If I'm walking up to someone intending to interact with them, that is close enough to see the lenses. Upon identifying those, I will elect instead to not interact with that person and keep on walking by.

    The details are too small to matter from a distance.That’s what I’m trying to say.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent