you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 104 points 1 year ago (15 children)

AFAIK these religions(so Islam and Judaism in this case) don't usually care about what non-believers eat, only believers are not allowed to eat pigs. So posting that does not even qualify as ragebait.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    As a Jew, I care what you eat. Cuz I'm gonna wanna go splitsies. What else should we get?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    we're a food oriented people. we don't ask you to eat like us, but we want to know what you eat so we can know who you are, how you grew up, what you love, and what you think of your grandmother. not from a place of judgement but from a sense of doikyat

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    I've never heard that word before, but now I love it.

    Also, I loved my Yiddish-speaking grandmother, but she was an awful cook and would stick her fingers in everyone's food, so I don't love food stories with her. Plus, she didn't like it when I'd eat bacon, but she "secretly" loved the stuff and would often steal some from me.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    yeah but here's the thing: the right doesn't merely take joy in other people's anger and suffering, it takes joy in the idea of it. That's why Right wing "Comedy" is just "x minority are stupid and bad" and why their audiences lap them up. They're not laughing at the worlds, they're laughing at the idea of people they hate being upset or suffering.

    They think that upsets people, and that's where they derive humour from.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    yeah, and most of those rules came about because pork was likely to contain parasites and was overall more dangerous. people interpreted getting sick because of unsafe food as being punished by god

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    No. It's cause its a food for poor people.

    Sort of. It's a bit more complicated than that. But religious food prohibitions are never rational. Most religious taboos are formed first and theological justification comes second.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)