you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 59 points 1 year ago* (12 children)

and it's a multi-billion dollar corporation, that already makes more money than you or I will ever see in our lifetimes, that actively strives to make the user experience worse for people who don't pay, when they've got a practical monopoly in the "free video sharing platform" market. And you're whiteknighting for them. 🤡

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    more money than you or I will ever see in our lifetimes

    I mean, I feel like you need to expand your comparison a little as the amount that you'll see in your lifetime is such a minute grain of sand on a beech compared to corporate profits. The money they made today, hell, in the last hour... minute... will dwarf the amount that you will likely see.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    actively strives to make the user experience worse for people who don't pay

    And evidently those who do! My parents live in a different country. What are they, not my family? What's the family plan for? (Rhetorical question)

    With Vanced I have so many more options to customize my experience. I can hide shorts I never watch, set a fixed resolution for data and wifi, return the stupid dislike ratio they removed... And if I'm using Vanced anyway to fix all the issues they introduce, why on earth would I additionally pay for their service?

    I want to pay for their shit, especially to support content creators, but I can't support a platform whose singular mission it is to make everything worse for everyone constantly. Feels like every month I have to get a new extension to undo some horrible design decision.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Gabe and his 300 yachts thanks you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    whiteknighting

    was a weak-ass criticism when it was on 4chan being leveled at anyone who said anything not derogatory about a woman, and it's weak-ass now. Oh no, someone on the internet has an at-least-partially positive opinion of a company, how awful, we'd better stereotype and body-shame them for it.

    If you had your way, the only comments about YouTube - or any other product from a large company - that would be allowed would be negative ones. How the fuck does that make sense?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago

    By Darwin you see a lot. I was merely stating that I think YouTube premium is worth the price I pay for it.

    Is there no product you are satisfied with? Your life must be pretty bleak.

  • source
  • parent