you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

I mean... weapons can be built for self-defense. Obviously, genocide is what's happening here, not self-defense. But it's not like there couldn't be some alternate universe where ✡ on a tank is not inherently bad.

Kind of an odd post.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Even then, I think religious symbols being national symbols and therefore on national flags and tanks is inherently bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think we can trust everyone involved to know exactly what the question meant and what the reply means.

    If he would think in your categories he could have answered something like "I would be happy if it wouldn't be needed." Or reply back with "In which context?" or something.

    He immediately jumped to making it "its either tanks or holocaust for us."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I guess I dislike this post because Zionists usually phrase Israeli's actions in terms of self-defense. So to people who are already anti-zionist, this post is interpretable; but to pro-zionists, it is at best nonsensical or at worst hateful. Either way -- it's polarizing.

    Just seems like the way we should be not using social media.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I think, in western media at least, that the tank is rarely used as an image of defence. A tank’s artillery is not personal or protective, it obliterates its targets from a distance. Its treads allow it to travel in terrain that has been decimated by war. The image of a tank ominously rolling over rubble and bodies in a war zone is contractually obliged to be in every war movie.

    The heavy armour on a tank is perhaps its only ‘defensive’ trait, but it only exists to let the men inside blow things up for as long as possible.

    It’s an all terrain cannon, and a country owning a fleet of them requires their neighbours to also invest in a fleet of them, just in case. This then causes their neighbours to invest in more tanks just to be extra ‘safe’

  • source
  • parent