you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 41 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

Because, despite being wildly impractical, it's technically built on tech that COULD be decentralized. Only recent a new host launched called Black sky. So it is no longer just one host. But it's been one host for so long it almost doesn't matter because so few people will switch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Technically, yes, if you squint; but, practically, no. It was designed with a prioritization of passing the information/data around to avoid any lack of missing anything (so you get a closer experience to the connectedness of Twitter than Mastodon) which means every instance hosts, basically, the entire world. Naturally, there's only going to be a few entities that can store and afford to store the entirety of the data of the network. There's no such thing as a small instance, in their protocol.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Doesn't BS have things in it's software that are hard coded to the main server, so it's not possible to make a completely independent host at the moment?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They continue to control 100% of the relays so they can control what servers are connected to the others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments