Here's the video you wanted: https://youtu.be/C_pg-5B8K2I
What facts do you think they're leaving out? Do you think this one headline is their only coverage?
I am literally retarded about specifically this
And yet you think you know more about it than a renowned news organization?
Again, what context do you think is missing? Did you read the report or just some twitter hot takes about the title?
You seem to think that communication only has one side, and that thinking about likely interpretation of your words is disingenuous
What? What part of "other articles have information about the dispute of Israeli claims", and those disputes being explicitly brought up in the article is only paying attention to one side? You're looking for editorial if you want your news to give you an interpretation, and propaganda if you're looking for it to lead the reader to a specific one.
decontextualizing knowledge and then telling you little bits is somehow 'neutral' or 'objective' or 'incapable of being lies'.
Where did I say that? Spoiler alert: I didn't, that's just what you would rather argue against.
You're very keen on insulting people you're talking to or devolving into the grotesque aren't you? It just makes you come across as childish and it's much easier to dismiss your opinions as those of an ignorant child.
I get it. You think your interpretation of the facts and the implied narrative is so clear and obvious that it's dishonest not to include it alongside a report, so when they issue a report on the IDFs initial internal investigation findings you feel like someone is trying to spin things for Israel when they don't actively support your narrative, even if they don't support Israels either.
They aren't however. Your interpretation and narrative didn't happen, they're implied. You can't take footage of motivation. The only insight we have into how the IDF selects targets is what they say, so the only facts are "Israel states their intent is to not kill journalists", "this isn't the first time they've killed a journalist this week", and "not even the first Reuters journalist".