Can't watch youtube from here. Security settings are a pain to change, and this doesn't merit.
appeal to authority
Well if you could explain why that's not a nonsense bullshit position, sure. But you haven't shown any interest in doing that. It shouldn't be hard. Please, make literally any attempt. I'll try my best to understand.
other articles have information about the dispute of
Not "this is a confirmed unreliable source". So it's still the headline any zio can use, but totally honest to an audience who consumes media in a way nobody consumes media these days. This is called honest reporting.
grotesque
Youre talking about the murder of journalists trying to catch genocidal war criminals being excused and normalized by the outlets that hired them. I sought only to match that level of fucked, and i genuinely don't think i was successful. If you think i was escalating, maybe that's an issue with you.
your interpretation
The writer is interpreting even on what they consider "neutral". How can you, in the year twenty rwenty five, nit understand this? Genuinely how?
both sides
Okay so you're lying. Like, there's cases where both sides, nut this really isn't one
the only insight is uncritical parroting of what we're told
Also a god damn century of precedent, the last hundred times this happened, explicit doctrine, how this story turbed out the last five hundred times we read it this year, the social media of the fucker who pulled the trigger (even odds they were also live streaming it over a truly horrible abuse of the rap genre) and report-backs from anyone with a strong enough stomach to press "hebrew to english" on their translation tool of choice. Yes. Other than those things all we have is their word against the word of the usual smouldering corpses.