you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

From the article:

Without offering evidence, Israel has in the past identified emergency responders who work under the Hamas-run government as militants to be targeted, including in the killing of 15 medics in March, when Israeli troops opened fire on ambulances in southern Gaza.

The information is there if you read it.

mourning the journalists killed by the terrorist state

Mourning the dead has no business being mixed in with news in a regular article - that belongs in an obituary or editorial. It sounds like you want the AP to compromise its journalistic integrity by offering unambiguous condemnation instead of cold facts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    BS when someone murder your journalist willingfully there is no space for nutrality

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Being biased (i.e. not being neutral):

    1. does not accomplish as much as you think it does, because the plain facts allow people to find the truth already. Only a minority of people will be swayed
    2. does harm that you are ignoring: it reduces trust in the outlet, and in journalism in general.

    So yes, there is absolutely space for neutrality; indeed it is critical.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments