▲ 449 ▼ Kick faces possible $49 M fine after French streamer Jean Pormanove dies on air (www.dexerto.com) submitted 1 year ago by xc2215x@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 170 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (7 children) Law is law. No emotion involved permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) Yeah, like all those laws about Israel and Palestine and such. Definitely no pesky emotions involved, no sirree permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (5 children) The law that oblige all UN stste members to stop isrsel terrorisms? Yes they should be applied permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Yes they should. Not my point. You still trying to argue that law doesn't involve emotion? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) That's not what 'law is emotionless' means. It means that the law should be applied regardless of the emotions of the culpable person, their family, or sympathizers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Ok? Nowhere in this discussion has it been suggested otherwise permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrdown@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) You claimed that the platform and the guys who was responsible of his death shouldn't be punished although that is not what the law say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago Ok... Looking through your profile, I'm guessing you're French speaking. That is not at all what I said or meant, neither is it what the law says (the law hasn't said anything, since by definition there needs to be a trial and conviction before the law can be considered to have said anything). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) Yeah, like all those laws about Israel and Palestine and such. Definitely no pesky emotions involved, no sirree permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (5 children) The law that oblige all UN stste members to stop isrsel terrorisms? Yes they should be applied permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Yes they should. Not my point. You still trying to argue that law doesn't involve emotion? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) That's not what 'law is emotionless' means. It means that the law should be applied regardless of the emotions of the culpable person, their family, or sympathizers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Ok? Nowhere in this discussion has it been suggested otherwise permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrdown@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) You claimed that the platform and the guys who was responsible of his death shouldn't be punished although that is not what the law say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago Ok... Looking through your profile, I'm guessing you're French speaking. That is not at all what I said or meant, neither is it what the law says (the law hasn't said anything, since by definition there needs to be a trial and conviction before the law can be considered to have said anything). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (5 children) The law that oblige all UN stste members to stop isrsel terrorisms? Yes they should be applied permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Yes they should. Not my point. You still trying to argue that law doesn't involve emotion? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) That's not what 'law is emotionless' means. It means that the law should be applied regardless of the emotions of the culpable person, their family, or sympathizers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Ok? Nowhere in this discussion has it been suggested otherwise permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrdown@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) You claimed that the platform and the guys who was responsible of his death shouldn't be punished although that is not what the law say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago Ok... Looking through your profile, I'm guessing you're French speaking. That is not at all what I said or meant, neither is it what the law says (the law hasn't said anything, since by definition there needs to be a trial and conviction before the law can be considered to have said anything). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Yes they should. Not my point. You still trying to argue that law doesn't involve emotion? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) That's not what 'law is emotionless' means. It means that the law should be applied regardless of the emotions of the culpable person, their family, or sympathizers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Ok? Nowhere in this discussion has it been suggested otherwise permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrdown@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) You claimed that the platform and the guys who was responsible of his death shouldn't be punished although that is not what the law say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago Ok... Looking through your profile, I'm guessing you're French speaking. That is not at all what I said or meant, neither is it what the law says (the law hasn't said anything, since by definition there needs to be a trial and conviction before the law can be considered to have said anything). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) That's not what 'law is emotionless' means. It means that the law should be applied regardless of the emotions of the culpable person, their family, or sympathizers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Ok? Nowhere in this discussion has it been suggested otherwise permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrdown@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) You claimed that the platform and the guys who was responsible of his death shouldn't be punished although that is not what the law say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago Ok... Looking through your profile, I'm guessing you're French speaking. That is not at all what I said or meant, neither is it what the law says (the law hasn't said anything, since by definition there needs to be a trial and conviction before the law can be considered to have said anything). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Ok? Nowhere in this discussion has it been suggested otherwise permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrdown@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) You claimed that the platform and the guys who was responsible of his death shouldn't be punished although that is not what the law say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago Ok... Looking through your profile, I'm guessing you're French speaking. That is not at all what I said or meant, neither is it what the law says (the law hasn't said anything, since by definition there needs to be a trial and conviction before the law can be considered to have said anything). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) You claimed that the platform and the guys who was responsible of his death shouldn't be punished although that is not what the law say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago Ok... Looking through your profile, I'm guessing you're French speaking. That is not at all what I said or meant, neither is it what the law says (the law hasn't said anything, since by definition there needs to be a trial and conviction before the law can be considered to have said anything). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago Ok... Looking through your profile, I'm guessing you're French speaking. That is not at all what I said or meant, neither is it what the law says (the law hasn't said anything, since by definition there needs to be a trial and conviction before the law can be considered to have said anything). permalink fedilink source parent