AwesomeLowlander comments on Kick faces possible $49 M fine after French streamer Jean Pormanove dies on air

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Yeah, I don't see how they're responsible either, but I'm getting lots of emotional replies and nobody actually seems to want to admit they're advocating censorship. Cognitive dissonance is a hell of a thing.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 13 child comments

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Sometimes censorship is good

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

Nobody has ever denied that censorship can sometimes be good. The problem has always been who gets to decide when it's good and when it isn't?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

Something being subjective and something being untrue aren't the same thing

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] SculptusPoe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

Okay. Fine. Who do you want to have control of what you can see, hear and read?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago*

I think Kick should be able to censor streams on their service that are showing torture. They are not, and should not be, obligated to provide their services to show that content.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

Law is law. No emotion involved

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 7 child comments

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Yeah, like all those laws about Israel and Palestine and such. Definitely no pesky emotions involved, no sirree

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 6 child comments

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The law that oblige all UN stste members to stop isrsel terrorisms? Yes they should be applied

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 5 child comments

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yes they should. Not my point. You still trying to argue that law doesn't involve emotion?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's not what 'law is emotionless' means. It means that the law should be applied regardless of the emotions of the culpable person, their family, or sympathizers.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ok? Nowhere in this discussion has it been suggested otherwise

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

You claimed that the platform and the guys who was responsible of his death shouldn't be punished although that is not what the law say

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Ok... Looking through your profile, I'm guessing you're French speaking. That is not at all what I said or meant, neither is it what the law says (the law hasn't said anything, since by definition there needs to be a trial and conviction before the law can be considered to have said anything).

permalink

fedilink

source

parent