Criminal charges require proof beyond a reasonable doubt. An accusation alone is not that. You paint it as assuming women are lying, but you instead want to treat their word as damning proof unto itself, while people like Crystal Mangum, Tracy West and Wanetta Gibson (to name some who got media attention) thoroughly leave the reasonable doubt in place.

And if you think anyone, without even considering gender should just be believed without any evidence, then you too, should go fuck yourself.

A judicial system does not function on feelings or beliefs. It functions on science. You need evidence in order to consider a position fact. Potentially ruining people's lives because of personal feelings, is fucking evil.

Edit. The person you replied to mentioned nothing about assuming women are lying, all they said was that they are capable of doing so.

I'm just saying that false accusations happen, a lot, and yeah, my one friend is just a single data point, OTOH:

https://www.nsvrc.org/publications/articles/false-reports-moving-beyond-issue-successfully-investigate-and-prosecute-non-s

"The article begins by reviewing up-to-date research suggesting that the rate of false reporting for sexual assault is in the range of 2-8%."

That's not me saying this, that's the National Sexual Violence Resource Center saying this.

So in a year with 734,630 rapes*:

https://www.nsvrc.org/statistics

Somewhere between 14,692 and 58,770 are going to be false accusations? That's a lot. Like "a lot" a lot. Potentially 10K more than the annual number of gun deaths and 2x the number of gun suicides.

*Unclear if that's an estimated number of rapes or the reported number of rapes. I'm assuming reported because it's the only number we've got here and there's no way to know the actual number with certainty.