edit to clarify a misconception in the comments, this is an instagram post so “caption” refers to the description under the image or video

as an example, this text i am typing now is also a “caption”

just saying because someone started a debate misunderstanding this to be about subtitles (aka “closed captions”) and that’s just not the case 👍

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 110 points 1 year ago (13 children)

No, what you are thinking of is speech to text software, it is much older than LLMs and works in a very different way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Yeah speech to text models have nothing to do with LLMs and their use for captioning is perfectly fine imo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -30 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • Large language models are designed to generate text based on previous text. Translation from audio to text can be done via a neural net but it isn’t a Large Language Model.

    Now, could you combine the two to say reduce error on words that were mumbled by having a generative model predict the words that would fit better in that unclear sentence. However you could likely get away with a much smaller and faster net than an LLM in fact you might be able to get away with using plain-Jane markov chains, no machine learning necessary.

    Point is that there is a difference between LLMs and other neural nets that produce text.

    In the case of audio to text translation, using an LLM would be very inefficient and slow (possibly to the point it isn’t able to keep up with the audio at all), and using a very basic text generation net or even just a probabilistic algorithm would likely do the job just fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    How would an llm fix a mistake equivalent to something being misheard? I feel like you're misunderstanding something and could probably also use some help with your English.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    While speech to text software indeed predates LLMs - LLMs do it as well. I've only tried a few basic (aka free) options so no idea how well they do en masse, but the generated results were at least on par if not better than YouTubes' auto caption.

    It might not technically be LLMs though. It could be a different type of "ai". I Just cant stand the "ai" marketing when nothing they are making is actually ai so until they pull their heads out their asses all "ai" models are LLMs to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Understandable, AI marketing now is a shitshot, but they are not even AI I think. Just people forget that tech used to do magic before AI existed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    This is a big part of it. Back when ai was first becoming big, my manager said they needed to run all my kb articles through an ai to generate link clouds or some such.

    I was like umm.. that’s a service this platform has always offered..? Like just because you don’t know what the kb tools do, or what our rock bottom subscription gets us, doesn’t mean I haven’t looked into it.. but that also isn’t worth doing because now we only have a handful of articles in any given category because I’m good at my job..

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's kind of the other way around, we've always had AI, it used to just basically mean a computer making some decision based on data. Like a thermostat changing the heating in response to a temperature change.

    Then we got LLMs and because they are good at pretending to have complex reasoning ability, AI as a term started to always mean "computer with near human level intelligence" which of course they are absolutely not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment