β² 224 βΌ Red meat wreaks havoc on gut and drives inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in study on mice (newatlas.com) submitted 1 year ago by usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to c/science@lemmy.world 112 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca -20 points 1 year ago (15 children) Are mice evolved to eat red meat? They haven't. So haven't we. π permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [+] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 20 points 1 year ago* (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* In fact Homo Erectus beat us to it by a couple million years. permalink fedilink source parent [β] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 2 points 1 year ago You still go hunting or are you buying factory meat? permalink fedilink source parent [β] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (11 children) You mean a few million years of evolution couldn't completely redesign our digestive system? Weak bruh. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (9 children) We haven't been eating like this for a few million years, humans mostly subsisted off of whatever they could get. Eating red meat every day, or even every week, is very modern. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [β] venusaur@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children) Fair, but our guts have already evolved to not being able to eat rotten meat. Theyβre apples and oranges, but still a relevant point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [β] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Dietary evolution happens really fast, comparatively speaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Cool story. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Wierdo. permalink fedilink source parent [β] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) Homo primates (archaic humans like Homo Erectus) have been hunting prolifically for about 2 million years. Thatβs part of what makes us Homo; the large calorie surplus from big game hunting allowed our brains to grow larger. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) More modern research does not suggest this made up most of the consumption for humans even before agriculture. For instance, Our results unequivocally demonstrate a substantial plant-based component in the diets of these hunter-gatherers. This distinct dietary pattern challenges the prevailing notion of high reliance on animal proteins among pre-agricultural human groups https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-024-02382-z permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago Buh buh buh joe rogan told me otherwise!!!! \s \s \s permalink fedilink source parent [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago afaik it's inconclusive, and just as likely that big game was rare and supplemented by many other forms of hunting and gathering. It's a lot easier to spear a fish or steal some eggs than to spend a whole day tracking down an elk until it collapsed from exhaustion. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [β] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Too bad humans are only 200,000 years old. Science < Wacky claims that confirm indoctrinated myths. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 20 points 1 year ago* (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* In fact Homo Erectus beat us to it by a couple million years. permalink fedilink source parent [β] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 2 points 1 year ago You still go hunting or are you buying factory meat? permalink fedilink source parent
[β] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* In fact Homo Erectus beat us to it by a couple million years. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 2 points 1 year ago You still go hunting or are you buying factory meat? permalink fedilink source parent
[β] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (11 children) You mean a few million years of evolution couldn't completely redesign our digestive system? Weak bruh. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (9 children) We haven't been eating like this for a few million years, humans mostly subsisted off of whatever they could get. Eating red meat every day, or even every week, is very modern. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [β] venusaur@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children) Fair, but our guts have already evolved to not being able to eat rotten meat. Theyβre apples and oranges, but still a relevant point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [β] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Dietary evolution happens really fast, comparatively speaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Cool story. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Wierdo. permalink fedilink source parent [β] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) Homo primates (archaic humans like Homo Erectus) have been hunting prolifically for about 2 million years. Thatβs part of what makes us Homo; the large calorie surplus from big game hunting allowed our brains to grow larger. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) More modern research does not suggest this made up most of the consumption for humans even before agriculture. For instance, Our results unequivocally demonstrate a substantial plant-based component in the diets of these hunter-gatherers. This distinct dietary pattern challenges the prevailing notion of high reliance on animal proteins among pre-agricultural human groups https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-024-02382-z permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago Buh buh buh joe rogan told me otherwise!!!! \s \s \s permalink fedilink source parent [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago afaik it's inconclusive, and just as likely that big game was rare and supplemented by many other forms of hunting and gathering. It's a lot easier to spear a fish or steal some eggs than to spend a whole day tracking down an elk until it collapsed from exhaustion. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [β] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Too bad humans are only 200,000 years old. Science < Wacky claims that confirm indoctrinated myths. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (9 children) We haven't been eating like this for a few million years, humans mostly subsisted off of whatever they could get. Eating red meat every day, or even every week, is very modern. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [β] venusaur@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children) Fair, but our guts have already evolved to not being able to eat rotten meat. Theyβre apples and oranges, but still a relevant point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [β] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Dietary evolution happens really fast, comparatively speaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Cool story. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Wierdo. permalink fedilink source parent [β] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) Homo primates (archaic humans like Homo Erectus) have been hunting prolifically for about 2 million years. Thatβs part of what makes us Homo; the large calorie surplus from big game hunting allowed our brains to grow larger. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) More modern research does not suggest this made up most of the consumption for humans even before agriculture. For instance, Our results unequivocally demonstrate a substantial plant-based component in the diets of these hunter-gatherers. This distinct dietary pattern challenges the prevailing notion of high reliance on animal proteins among pre-agricultural human groups https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-024-02382-z permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago Buh buh buh joe rogan told me otherwise!!!! \s \s \s permalink fedilink source parent [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago afaik it's inconclusive, and just as likely that big game was rare and supplemented by many other forms of hunting and gathering. It's a lot easier to spear a fish or steal some eggs than to spend a whole day tracking down an elk until it collapsed from exhaustion. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[β] venusaur@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children) Fair, but our guts have already evolved to not being able to eat rotten meat. Theyβre apples and oranges, but still a relevant point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [β] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Dietary evolution happens really fast, comparatively speaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Cool story. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Wierdo. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Dietary evolution happens really fast, comparatively speaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Cool story. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Wierdo. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Cool story. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Wierdo. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) Homo primates (archaic humans like Homo Erectus) have been hunting prolifically for about 2 million years. Thatβs part of what makes us Homo; the large calorie surplus from big game hunting allowed our brains to grow larger. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) More modern research does not suggest this made up most of the consumption for humans even before agriculture. For instance, Our results unequivocally demonstrate a substantial plant-based component in the diets of these hunter-gatherers. This distinct dietary pattern challenges the prevailing notion of high reliance on animal proteins among pre-agricultural human groups https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-024-02382-z permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago Buh buh buh joe rogan told me otherwise!!!! \s \s \s permalink fedilink source parent [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago afaik it's inconclusive, and just as likely that big game was rare and supplemented by many other forms of hunting and gathering. It's a lot easier to spear a fish or steal some eggs than to spend a whole day tracking down an elk until it collapsed from exhaustion. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[β] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) More modern research does not suggest this made up most of the consumption for humans even before agriculture. For instance, Our results unequivocally demonstrate a substantial plant-based component in the diets of these hunter-gatherers. This distinct dietary pattern challenges the prevailing notion of high reliance on animal proteins among pre-agricultural human groups https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-024-02382-z permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago Buh buh buh joe rogan told me otherwise!!!! \s \s \s permalink fedilink source parent
[β] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago Buh buh buh joe rogan told me otherwise!!!! \s \s \s permalink fedilink source parent
[β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago afaik it's inconclusive, and just as likely that big game was rare and supplemented by many other forms of hunting and gathering. It's a lot easier to spear a fish or steal some eggs than to spend a whole day tracking down an elk until it collapsed from exhaustion. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Too bad humans are only 200,000 years old. Science < Wacky claims that confirm indoctrinated myths. permalink fedilink source parent