[–] 1 point 5 months ago

Lol. Lets just throw enough random shit in a pile until it kinda sorta looks like a rocket booster and we'll call it an 'improving tech', which will he perfected in 2-3 years.

Now pay me $100B

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago*

    But over the past decade, Peter Scholze(opens a new tab) of the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in Bonn and Dustin Clausen(opens a new tab) of the Institute of Advanced Scientific Studies in France have sought to replace topological spaces. They have defined a new category of mathematical objects called condensed sets, which resemble a sort of infinitely fine dust and retain all the nicest properties of topological spaces without the drawbacks. Dust, it turns out, is a better foundational material than the pebbly, well-understood soil of topological spaces.

    “They are solving a problem we didn’t know we had,” said Ravi Vakil(opens a new tab), a mathematician at Stanford University and president of the American Mathematical Society, “because we already had what we thought were reasonable solutions.” As a result, “a whole slate of mathematics has become much simpler.”

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Hmmm. So, you mean... Cannabis makes math hard for a nonzero number of people,

    ...and likely makes the inherent irony of pop anything let alone country as "working" class music, well, a little uncomfortable for also a nonzero number of people.

    Cool cool. Tracks.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago*

    This reads like that story where a student was late to class, saw some unsolved conjecture on the blackboard and thought it was homework, and proved it because he didn't know it was supposed to be hard, so didn't have the mental block.

    Chatgpt hallucinated something that an actual mathematician interpreted into the (accidental?) right direction and they ended up somewhere correct, great! But not as impressive as they're making the headline sound by far.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    Thank you! And I agree that the situation is interesting, but I didn't need any of it beyond the first paragraph, I was more interested in the math context. And it was late and I was reading it right before going to bed so that also shifts perspective 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    "Cairo showed that in her function, they didn’t cancel out as expected. Instead, their interference created uneven patterns, causing the function’s energy to spread out over some areas and concentrate in others in a fractal-like way that the Mizohata-Takeuchi conjecture prohibited."

    Also she's 17 and going for her doctorate without either a GED or undergraduate degree, which is certainly interesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago

    Yes, that's the main problem with this, how numbers with different digits can be equal. It wasn't intended for anything serious though, just a fun thought experiment.

    I didn't come up with this entirely on my own. I encountered a number system on Everything2 or Reddit, and it was described as a "prime-factorization based number system" IIRC; but it was much more complicated than this and I can't remember how it works.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I like this because it is both easy to understand and I never heard a similar idea before. That said, I am also not a mathematician.

    One downside of both representations is that conversion from base N representation is ambiguous, and it'd involve something like factorization to get at least one equivalent in your representations. I would probably attempt to find the highest digit with the highest possible value first, and then add the remainder in the same (recursive) way.

    I'd like to see a Mathologer or Numberphile video on properties of such a number system :) like addition and substraction calculations.

  • source
  • view more: next ›