[–] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, yes, exactly! You shouldn’t trust it.

If this was any other computer program that could execute arbitrary system commands unreliably, standard procedure would be to sandbox the living snot out of it.

It’s baffling to me that “AI” is somehow an excuse to ignore this. Hence that’s exactly what I mean: I’d want rock solid guarantees of containerization, and granular scoping.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I wouldn't trust an agent outside of a capabilities-based OS, like if Genode was ready for production. I don't even use AI at all, but if I was actually using agents, I'd want guarantees that not only do you not have access to certain things, you cannot properly conceive of how to access them, it is utterly beyond the agent.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Seems like their AIs had some of the same ideas you're having here, since about a week or two ago they had an issue open about moving the basis of Omarchy over to Nix.

    That got buried somehow, cannot find it in Github anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

    ...Let's play devil's advocate.

    Isn't it a terrible architecture for agents?

    The ideal distro would be:

    • A strictly immutable base configuration.

    • "Rings" of access privilege everywhere, enforced across the whole OS. Something like Qubes OS.

    • Top tier, security audited, prepackaged setups for vllm, llama.cpp, various agenic frameworks and such, something better than a massive docker install for every one.

    • Multiple versions of patched/optimized Python akin to Clear Linux or CachyOS.

    • A kernel/scheduler tuned for compute and low IO latency.

    • Good Nvidia/rocm/Intel support, which Arch does provide, admittedly.

    • Simple, minimalistic desktop UI that is easy for an agent to interpret in a screenshot, and easy for it to operate. Ideally with integrated hooks.

    • And an “easy” headless mode for less overhead

    • Prepackaged, open source agenic browsers and embeddings servers.

    • Links and guides for more niche machine learning/data processing projects, instead of to the most popular ones that already have official guides.


    Omarchy has... precisely none of that? Except for what in inherits from Arch.

    Lack of any containerization in particular is one reason OpenClaw (the previous Twitter AI fad) was such a flaming mess.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    I remember reading somewhere that DHH offered them money but they politely declined.

    So I guess we cannot whine anymore that he doesn't give money upstream.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    So what are they actually doing with all this money they’ve raised?

    Like, why all the sponsors? We can look at Mitchell Hashimoto and Ghostty to see that these rich CEOs can retire and build freely. I don’t get it.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Yeah...

    I've just grown a thick skin over those kind of slopper accusations. Just ignore it; there's no point in engaging with it here on Lemmy.

    Besides, I'd bet money Lupert indirectly uses more corporate "AI" than you or me and doesn't even know it. That kind of hate is exactly what the AI giants want, as it will squash their competition and create willful ignorance around their products.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Nothing against Hyperland, but be advised that iirc, there are currently working on things that break config files (what omarchy sums up to be)

    If you want something quick-ish, KDE could work as a replacement, granted you use the keyboard shortcuts.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    3m in AI world is literally nothing. You could spend that in a few days training a model. 3m is basically a token amount for marketing purposes. This is not a serious deal in any way.

  • source
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›