I'm reading this as being scaled in the unit "mountains" and no one can stop me
comments
bitchimabus offers anecdotal data
There is nothing in that link linking them to Elon Musk, and they are transparent about their funding from Bill Gates https://global-change-data-lab.org/. Just because they have a neoliberal slant does not make their work worthless.
Besides, they clearly cite the study that the chart is based on https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2134/agronj2005.0001
Edit: Missed the link to the musk foundation, one moment.
Edit 2: They claim
Our World in Data lists various “sponsors” that have made contributions to support the project. These “sponsors” include the Musk Foundation, the Pritzker Innovation Fund, and the Camp Foundation. OWID also notes that it is funded by “more than 4,000 people” who have donated directly via the website.
They do not list any sponsors on the page linked.
I could not find anything on https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/musk-foundation/ about them.
All I could find is
Global Change Data Lab is supported by donations from several thousand readers of the web publication Our World in Data, as well as grants from the Quadrature Climate Foundation and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. In the past we have also received support from the World Health Organization, the Department of Health and Social Care in the United Kingdom, and many other generous individuals and organizations that have made contributions to our work.
You find our accounts and a full description of how we are funded in our Annual Report; and you can read the list of donors and supporters on Our World in Data’s Funding Page.
ourworldindata is corporate/neoliberal propaganda sponsored by Bill Gates and Elon Musk
https://www.influencewatch.org/organization/our-world-in-data/
I'm sure the people who are pushing for the bathroom stuff would make an exception if they saw buck angel following their wife into the bathroom.
I could not find anything going back further.

For context


Sadly, I’ll be surprised if this half-joke is at all wrong,
It seems to have stayed mostly stable.


that would be a question that makes question sense. that is not what they asked.
poles often have questions they think make sense that don't unfortunately. if I didn't always try to duck up poles anyway….
People dont just suddenly decide to hate gay people in 2023+.
Dutchie here. Not gay. During an office party one of the bosses mentioned a new employee was "part of the club" (i.e., gay). I found that so disrespectful I quit.
Not to say homophobia is not an issue here and feels like it's been on the rise past years (within certain more 'conservative' demographics). But yeah, the average Dutch person couldn't give a flying fuck.
These numbers to me are just bizarre to me. One third in the USA, holy shit! Land of the free, except if you're not like me.
Sadly, I'll bet the martyr effect will just amplify his voice.
Cool, now let's see the same chart for transphobia.
The eternal basedness of the Dutch mind
"How much do you like homosexuals? 1 for 'seething hatred,' 10 for 'I am gay myself.'"
Well, there was one homophobic voice cut short lately at least.
how is that question answered on a scale of 1-10?
Followed by an incredibly sharp rise in the years immediately following where this chart stopped.
Sadly, I'll be surprised if this half-joke is at all wrong,
Since '84? How is that news?
I like this, Netherlands transforming itself from traditional wind country to futuristic wind country (traditional wind mill to electrical wind generator)
That's cool as hell, not juat a biological pathway description for PET plastic digestion, but they've ID'd the genes for it and everything. =D
We have a clean source of energy that could have prevented countless deaths, that we chose not to use. And the saddest part is because we chose not to use it it grew far more expensive thanks to negative learning.
Overnight construction cost per kilowatt hour in the United States:

Meanwhile in France, where they continued to build:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421516300106#f0030
you could hug a dry cask and get less radiation exposure than from eating a banana. From a technical standpoint, it's a solved problem.
kyle hill on youtube has a video on this.
If there's at least one thing I can agree on with the Rep/lean Rep in this chart is would definitely be on nuclear. I personally don't got beef with it so long as we find a better way of disposing the resulting waste than just burying it ( unless we already have a better, more effective and efficient method ).
We can clearly see how stupid Republicans and Republican leaning voters are from this chart alone. You have to be all kinds of stupid to think expanding coal, offshore drilling, and fracking are good ideas. May every supporter have runoff in their drinking water. We need another pandemic.
The real sadness is nuclear.