[–] 4 points 3 weeks ago*

Oh yeah, it's way better. Because this is actually an adventure game instead of a raunchy minigames collection. The wet dreams games have what you want in a Larry game, but aren't the best in the series.

I will never understand delisting games. Good thing owners can still play them.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I remembering trying Magna Cum Laude around the time it was released and it did not impress. Didn't really bother with other post-LSL7 games after that.

    I did get this one on GOG though, review seem to imply it's better than Magna Cum Laude.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    The game and story was fun, but half the puzzles were too random and you had to use every object on every person to see what happened. There was no thinking required, and that was a bit of a disappointment.

    spoiler
    I loved the jump scare with Edna at the end though.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    AFAIK there's nothing stopping you on rubbing every item ever on the thing

    I did hastily search what the puzzle was, found this gamefaqs walkthrough: https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/pc/189927-thimbleweed-park/faqs/74655

    spoilerShe [Delores] was given a BALLOON ANIMAL with instructions to watch the Kickstarter video. If you were a project backer and/or you watched that initial pitch video that Ron Gilbert and Gary Winnick put out, you were probably laughing about this as much as I was.

    In any case, head all the way back to where it began -- to the CORPSE in the river by the bridge. It's poetic and a little bit cheesy, but hey. USE the BALLOON ANIMAL on the corpse and the game will start "glitching." Soon you'll be in the Wireframe World.

    anyway, it's just the "reliance" on out-of-game media that rubs me wrong. I don't expect KS to keel over tomorrow, but it requires internet to check. This could be a pretty hefty speedbump for someone playing the game on eg. steamdeck and not having any kind of internet access, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    The game is great, but (IIRC) one of the later puzzles requires you to go out-of-game to check their kickstarter -video for a solution - which I guess is "cool" due to the metanarrative (assuming I use the word right), but... I do prefer games to be bit more self-contained. Is the game going to be "softlocked" once the kickstarter-campaign page gets taken down or so?

    I haven't played the game since I got it after release, who knows, they might have fixed the ks-video requirement.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Soooo, the ending of

    Tap for spoilerThimbleweed Park

    turned into a main plot device with added Quicktime-Events? Eh, might give it a try, but I'm not that enticed.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    Not that I'm trying to gatekeep this, but I'm not sure I like the idea.

    I thought BS was an absolute masterpiece - a great story, decent acting, good pacing (with the exception of a couple of high profile puzzles), and it gave me an interest in the Knights Templar when I've never been interested in history. I'm not sure what a movie would bring to the party, especially when The da Vinci Code probably took the formula and did it well already.

    That said... the making of a movie doesn't affect my enjoyment of the game so go wild I guess.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    TT's The Walking Dead series was a great entry point for normies getting into Visual Novel-type games, but they failed to add the bog standard sorts of features needed in a VN. Things like skip-everything-but-unread, text rollbacks, and so on. All the features that make replaying different routes fun and accessible.

    To make matters worse, all the slow "gameplay" sections didn't really add much to the story and mostly just served as speedbumps for replaying. The games were build to lock you into a single playthrough where "choices mattered" and they really didn't want you exploring other story paths.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    I still haven't played Double Exposure. It got really bad reviews, I'm kind of waiting for a sale. But if it's not very good, other than lacking Chloe in that one, what's really got people excited about this one? Just Chloe?

    I will tolerate a lot of BS in Life is Strange before I give up on them.

  • source
  • view more: next ›